Instagram

Translate

Wednesday, June 02, 2010

What does being gay have to do with eating hamburgers?

McDonald's goes gay in new TV ad
McDonald's has targeted gay teenagers in a new commercial which local rights advocates say is a refreshing step forward for the fast food giant.

The ad, which will air in France, shows a teenage boy sitting at a table while talking on a mobile phone and looking at a class photograph.

"I was thinking about you too ... I'm looking at your class picture," the boy says in French.

The teenager's father returns to the table with their meal and says: "It's a shame you’re in an all-boys college. You would have had all the girls chasing you."

The teen gives his father a sly smile as the tagline "Come as you are" appears on the bottom of the screen.

The advertisement is one of several in the new McDonald's campaign.

Gay advocates have hailed the ad as a "big step forward".

"It depicts a young gay man realistically and without judgement and it includes gay people in an institution that, for many families, is an integral part of their everyday life," Australian Coalition for Equality spokesman Rodney Croome said.

"If McDonalds' aim was to make an ad which says 'everybody is welcome' then it has succeeded and I'd strongly urge McDonalds in Australia to do the same."

But other advocates have slammed the ad, saying it fails to hit the mark.

"What does being gay have to do with eating hamburgers?" gay activist Gary Burns said.

"The ad should have a more inclusive message based around tolerance and understanding for gay men and lesbians in society in general and not just in McDonald's hamburger joints."

McDonald's Australia told ninemsn there were no plans to produce a local version of the ad.


Saudi's Women Rights

By KATHERINE ZOEPF
Published: June 01, 2010

JIDDA - Roughly two years ago, Rowdha Yousef began to notice a disturbing trend: Saudi women like herself were beginning to organize campaigns for greater personal freedoms. Suddenly, there were women asking for the right to drive, to choose whether to wear a veil, and to take a job without a male relative's permission, all using the Internet to collect signatures and organize meetings and all becoming, she felt, more voluble by the month.The final straw came last summer, when she read reports that a female activist in Saudi Arabia's eastern province, Wajeha al-Huwaider, had been to the border with Bahrain, demanding to cross using only her passport, without a male chaperon or a male guardian's written permission.Ms. Huwaider was not allowed to leave the country unaccompanied and, like other Saudi women campaigning for new rights, has failed - so far - to change any existing laws or customs.But Ms. Yousef is still outraged, and since August has taken on activists at their own game. With 15 other women, she started a campaign, "My Guardian Knows What's Best for Me." Within two months, they had collected more than 5,400 signatures on a petition "rejecting the ignorant requests of those inciting liberty" and demanding "punishments for those who call for equality between men and women, mingling between men and women in mixed environments, and other unacceptable behaviors."Ms. Yousef's fight against the would-be liberalizers symbolizes a larger tussle in Saudi society over women's rights that has suddenly made the female factor a major issue for reformers and conservatives striving to shape Saudi Arabia's future.Public separation of the sexes is a strongly distinctive feature of Saudi Arabia, making it perhaps a logical area for fierce debate. Since women have such a limited role in Saudi public life, however, it is somewhat surprising that it is their rights that have become a matter of open contention in a society that keeps most debate hidden.Surprising, too, are the complexities turned up by the debate, which go far beyond what some Saudis see as the simplistic Western argument that women are simply entitled to more rights.Take Ms. Yousef. She is a 39-year-old divorced mother of three (aged 13, 12 and 9) who volunteers as a mediator in domestic abuse cases. A tall, confident woman with a warm, effusive manner and sparkling stiletto-heeled sandals, her conversation, over Starbucks lattes, ranges from racism in the kingdom (Ms. Yousef has Somali heritage and calls herself a black Saudi) to her admiration for Hillary Rodham Clinton to the abuse she says she has suffered at the hands of Saudi liberals.She believes firmly that most Saudis share her conservative values but insists that adherence to Shariah law and family custom need not restrict a woman seeking a say. Female campaigners in the reform camp, she says, are influenced by Westerners who do not understand the needs and beliefs of Saudi women."These human rights groups come, and they only listen to one side, those who are demanding liberty for women," she said.Every Saudi woman, regardless of age or status, must have a male relative who acts as her guardian and has responsibility for and authority over her in a host of legal and personal matters.Ms. Yousef, whose guardian is her elder brother, said that she enjoyed a great deal of freedom while respecting the rules of her society. Guardian rules are such that she could start her campaign, for instance, without seeking her guardian's permission.She did not wish to speak in detail about her divorce but noted that, unusually, she had retained custody of her children through their 18th birthdays. She said she had founded her guardianship campaign unassisted, without any special connections, enlisting women in her circle of contacts as fellow founding members.Activists like Ms. Huwaider, Ms. Yousef believes, are susceptible to foreign influences because of personal problems with men. "If she is suffering because of her guardian, she can go to a Shariah court that could remove the responsibility for her from that man and transfer it to someone who is more trustworthy."To an outsider, Ms. Yousef's effort - petitioning King Abdullah to disregard calls for gender equality - might seem superfluous. After all, Saudi women still may not drive or vote and are obliged by custom to wear the floor-length cloaks known as abayas, and headscarves, outside their own homes.Women may not appear in court, and though they may be divorced via brief verbal declarations from their husbands, they frequently find it very difficult to obtain divorce themselves. Fathers may marry off 10-year-old daughters, a practice defended by the highest religious authority, Grand Mufti Abdul Aziz al-Sheikh.The separation of genders in Saudi public life is difficult to overstate - there are women-only stores, women-only lines in fast food restaurants, and women-only offices in private companies. Members of the hai'a, the governmental Committee for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice, patrol to ensure that ikhtilat, or "mixing" of the sexes, does not occur.There are a few places where men and women do work together - medical colleges, some hospitals, a handful of banks and private companies. But the percentage of Saudis in such environments is minuscule.Jidda and Riyadh host stand-up comedy shows where young people do mix - albeit summoned with only hours' notice via cellphone in an attempt to dodge policing. At the popular Janadriyah cultural festival in Riyadh, families were allowed to visit together for the first time last year, instead of on separate men's and women's days.Where conservatives like Ms. Yousef attribute the recent volubility of rights campaigners to Western meddling, liberals say that Saudi society itself is changing, and that increasing freedoms for Saudi women appear to be cautiously supported by King Abdullah himself.Both sides of the debate tend to claim the king's backing. Recent history suggests that the sympathies of the 85-year-old monarch - whose feelings are never explicitly outlined in public - lie with the reformers. If so, he seems out in front of most of his youthful subjects (an estimated two-thirds of the 29 million Saudis are under 25).The king has appeared in newspaper photographs alongside Saudi women with uncovered faces, a situation that was unimaginable until very recently. Last year, he appointed a woman to deputy minister rank, a first for Saudi Arabia. Schools and colleges remain rigidly segregated by gender, but the opening last September of a coeducational post-graduate research university, the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, was hotly debated, even if only about 15 percent of the nearly 400 students at Kaust, as it is known, are Saudi.A senior cleric was fired last October after criticizing gender mixing at Kaust on a television call-in show. Two months later, Sheikh Ahmad al-Ghamdi, the head of Mecca's branch of the Committee for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice, caused a sensation when he told The Okaz, a newspaper, that gender mixing was "part of normal life." In February, Sheikh Abdul Rahman al-Barrak, another prominent cleric, issued a fatwa that proponents of gender mixing should be killed. Whether it is the king's support, or simply the ever greater availability of digital social networks, campaigning is mushrooming on both sides of the women's rights divide, although Ms. Yousef's is so far thought to be the only conservative effort led by a woman.Hatoon al-Fassi, an assistant professor of women's history at King Saud University in Riyadh, called 2009 "the year of the campaigns" for women in Saudi Arabia. Female Saudi activists embraced causes as diverse as an effort to ban child marriage and the right to set up businesses without male sponsors.Reem Asaad lectures in the finance department at Dar al-Hekma College in Jidda. She organized a nationwide boycott of lingerie shops that employ only men, choosing lingerie because even Saudi conservatives can agree that it may be humiliating for a woman to buy underwear from a male clerk.Her ultimate aim is to broaden women's job opportunities. Outside her university office, where her all-female students wait for meetings with their teacher, hangs a photocopy of the country page for Saudi Arabia from the Global Gender Gap Report for 2009 by the World Economic Forum. In "economic participation and opportunity" for women, the kingdom ranks 133 out of 134 listed countries, above only Yemen. "Many Saudis would rather see a woman in poverty than have her work," Ms. Asaad said. "This is about opening doors for women in different sectors of the economy."Ms. Huwaider, who so incensed Ms. Yousef with her attempts to cross into Bahrain, is a veteran campaigner, famously seen driving illegally in a YouTube clip in 2008. Now she distributes small lengths of black elastic to Saudi women, asking them to wear the ribbons until Saudi laws treat them as adults.Soon, she said in an interview, she plans a campaign for the Saudi government to put in place a law requiring men who wish to take a second wife to obtain permission from the first wife. Morocco has such a law, which Ms. Huwaider believes could serve as a useful model.Ms. Huwaider emphatically rejects Ms. Yousef's characterization that she attacks the guardianship system because of personal problems. Her male guardian, she said, is her ex-husband, and they have excellent relations.She did agree, notionally, with Ms. Yousef's claim that many if not most Saudi men try to be fair and caring guardians. "Saudi men pride themselves on their chivalry," Ms. Huwaider said, "but it's the same kind of feeling they have for handicapped people or for animals. The kindness comes from pity, from lack of respect."Ms. Huwaider lives at what she said was considerable expense - the equivalent of $16,000 a year - in the guarded compound of the Saudi Aramco oil company. She is an employee of Aramco, working in a department that runs further education and employee development, and took the rare step, for a Saudi, of moving into the compound in 2007, after her campaign for the right to drive provoked several death threats. Sometimes, she conceded, it is frightening. But she has grown so accustomed to it that "sometimes I think to myself, 'Oh, I didn't get any threats today."'Over tea and curried snack mix at her home in Riyadh, Ms. Fassi pronounced herself "very optimistic" about the women's campaigns for more freedom. They break the censure on expression, and the list of topics that Saudi writers may address without being censored has also expanded very rapidly, Ms. Fassi said."The media is not that free, still, but it is much better than it was a few years ago. Nowadays we talk openly about minors' marriages, about rape and incest, about cases brought against the religious police."And, of course, the activism produces backlash. "This campaign of Rowdha Yousef's is a reaction," she said - unaware that Ms. Yousef, when contacted by this reporter, expressed surprise that a journalist had come from New York to meet her. Ms. Yousef said more than 30 articles discussing her campaign had appeared in the Saudi press, but no Saudi reporter was willing to meet her, and coverage was mainly what she called mocking opinion columns.Ahmad al-Omran, a pharmacist who blogs under the name Saudi Jeans, points out that, in the absence of opinion polling or free elections, it is hard to measure the popularity or representative nature of women's campaigns. None have produced even an official response from the Saudi leadership."What do they achieve?" Mr. Omran asked. "Changing laws comes from higher up, not lower down." Even the most optimistic say that change will be slow. Ms. Fassi explained that even the hint of breaking the taboo on gender mixing had been traumatic for many Saudis. "People had lived their whole lives doing one thing and believing one thing, and suddenly the king and the major clerics were saying that mixing was O.K.," Ms. Fassi said.The extent of this trauma may be difficult for outsiders to understand, Ms. Fassi said. "You can't begin to imagine the impact that the ban on mixing has on our lives and what lifting this ban would mean."Noura Abdulrahman, an Education Ministry employee who recently founded an after-school Islamic studies program aimed at teenage girls in Riyadh, said she tries to be generous toward the "liberaliyeen" - Saudi conservatives give the English word an Arabic plural and frequently employ it as a term of disparagement."The liberals' motives might be good - they might want to make Saudi Arabia competitive with Western societies - but they're failing to understand the uniqueness of Saudi society," Ms. Abdulrahman said. "In Saudi culture, women have their integrity and a special life that is separate from men. As a Saudi woman, I demand to have a guardian. My work requires me to go to different regions of Saudi Arabia, and during my business trips I always bring my husband or my brother. They ask nothing in return - they only want to be with me."While Ms. Abdulrahman was discussing guardianship with a visitor, a neighbor, Umm Muhammad, dropped in for a morning tea. She proudly volunteered that her own guardian, her husband, was out of town but they were in constant touch by phone. In fact, she had just called him for permission to visit Ms. Abdulrahman."The image in the West is that we are dominated by men, but they always forget the aspect of love," she said. "People who aren't familiar with Shariah often have the wrong idea. If you want stability and safety in your life, if you want a husband who takes care of you, you won't find it except in Islam."Eman Fahad is a 31-year-old linguistics graduate student and mother of three. In her blog, she called Ms. Yousef's campaign an effort to "stand against women who are demanding to be treated as adults."Even if most Saudi men are caring guardians, Ms. Fahad said, until women have full adult rights under the law, there will be abuses. She said she resented conservatives' portrayal of Saudi women's rights activists as spoiled and frivolous. She spoke of women she had met who had been forced to quit work they loved because their guardianship had been transferred to a new, less understanding man, and of women with no legal recourse when estranged husbands snatched their children away."These are the women they are fighting for," Ms. Fahad said of the campaigners. "They're not campaigning because they really want to be allowed to go crazy in some nightclub."Yet Ms. Fahad conceded that most Saudi women cleave to tradition. "If you actually talk to ordinary people," including in her circle, she said, "you'll find that most people want things to stay the same."
Sent from my BlackBerry®
powered by Sinyal Kuat INDOSAT

Ooo...how about my trips next year?

Kontan Online | INDUSTRI PENERBANGAN - AirAsia Minta Pemprov Jabar Sediakan Dana Untuk Penebalan Landasan Bandara
JAKARTA. PT Indonesia AirAsia tidak kehilangan akal. Usai ditolak permintaan penebalan landasan (overlay) Bandara Husein Sastranegara, Bandung oleh PT Angkasa Pura II (Persero), AirAsia meminta Pemprov Jawa Barat menyediakan dana untuk overlay.

Direktur Pemasaran dan Distribusi AirAsia Widijastoro Nugroho mengaku maskapainya bisa mengerti jika AP II menganggap overlay senilai Rp 60 miliar tidak ekonomis.

"Kalau AP II tidak mau investasi Rp 60 miliar, sebaiknya Pemprov Jabar yang membiayainya. Karena kalau sampai penerbangan kami ke Bandung ditutup dengan alasan tidak bisa didarati Airbus A320, yang rugi tentu masyarakat Bandung," ujar Widijastoro, Selasa (1/6).

Kerugian tersebut disebutnya jauh lebih besar dibanding Rp 60 miliar yang harus dikeluarkan untuk overlay. Karena jika tidak ada turis yang diangkut ke Bandung, otomatis hilang pula duit yang dibelanjakan turis tersebut di kota Bandung untuk hotel, restoran dan cinderamata lainnya.

Ia memastikan penerbangan AirAsia ke Bandung dari Kuala Lumpur, Denpasar, Medan, dan Singapura masih bisa dilakukan sampai November 2010 menggunakan Boeing 737-300. Namun, setelah tanggal tersebut penerbangan ke Bandung terancam ditutup menyusul berakhirnya kontrak sewa pesawat itu dengan lessor.

"Sewa Boeing sampai November ini. Kalau belum dilakukan overlay ya kami tidak bisa angkut penumpang kesana karena pakai Airbus A320 bandaranya tidak bisa menampung," tegasnya.


Tuesday, June 01, 2010

Israelis must speak up for Gaza activists | Daphna Baram | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk
A few months ago I was handed a leaflet from the group that organised the humanitarian aid flotilla to Gaza. I entertained the idea of joining it as a journalist because I believed the presence of journalists and of Israelis would make its journey safer. I gave up the idea because the pressing chores of life were more demanding and also – I wonder if I'll ever be able to forgive myself for this sentiment – I was somewhat horrified by the idea of spending a lot of time on a ship with a bunch of Kumbaya-singing hippies.

I did not think the IDF would attack the ships. I thought Israel was too clever, too PR aware, to jeopardise the lives of foreign nationals for the whole world to see. I didn't for a moment foresee anything resembling the murderous carnage the world witnessed on Monday morning. Little did I know.

I must have forgotten that even though Likud and Labour governments might be prone to identical behaviour when it comes to land grabbing, settlement building and Palestinian human rights oppression, there is still a great difference in their levels of stupidity, and their disregard of international public opinion. The one good thing about traditional Labour governments is that, on occasion, a raised cautioning finger from the US administration or an international outcry might make them stop and think for a minute.

What harm would have come to Israel if it had let the protesters embark in Gaza and deliver their goods? The world media generally yawns at such initiatives, and all the activists could have rationally hoped for would have been a photo op in an obscure back page of a number of broadsheets. Israel could have come out of it looking majestically generous.

But Israel has moved into a new stage in the last few months. The defiant and paranoid spirit emanating from Binyamin Netanyahu, Avigdor Lieberman and their opportunistic and violent Labour ally, Ehud Barak, is poisoning the internal public discourse. Ministers and members of parliament are openly inciting against Palestinian citizens of Israel and their political representatives in the most racist manner, and against leftwing activists – Jewish as well as Arab. The talk about "traitors", "backstabbers", "snitches" and "fifth column" are increasingly reminiscent of the Weimar republic.

It is not just Hamas and Hezbollah, or even the whole of the Palestinian people that seems to be the enemy, it is everybody: from "hypocritical and Muslim-infested" Europe to the soapy liberals among the Israelis, from the journalists to the lawyers. Journalist Anat Kam is facing trial on spying allegations for leaking military documents when serving as a soldier, and journalist Uri Blau has gone into exile in London under intimidating threats of facing similar charges for publishing them.

Ameer Makhoul and Dr Omar Saeed (human right activists and Israeli citizens) were arrested in the middle of the night at their homes some two weeks ago, and were unlawfully prevented from conferring with their lawyers for 12 days. Now they are facing trial on extremely controversial spying allegations. In this atmosphere, no wonder the government now starts killing European human rights activists and protesters in an act of terrorist piracy.

The international peace movement has shown that it consists of much more that "Kumbaya-singing hippies". It showed immense courage and solidarity with Gaza's people, and paid an incredibly heavy price in the lives of heroic activists. They have followed the footsteps of Rachel Corrie and Tom Hurndall, in sacrificing their lives while exposing the evils of the Israeli occupation forces.

Any decent Israeli citizen is faced with very clear choices today. The first is to support the government and the army, to pretend to buy into their stories about "gunfire coming from the ship". The second is to align ourselves with the people who died on board the Gaza flotilla, and to back their struggle for a better future in Israel in Palestine.

The Israeli government proves day after day that when you start robbing human rights off someone, you end up robbing them off everyone. The savage attack in the Mediterranean should be a wake-up call for every Israeli. If we do not speak up now, nobody will be left when the Netanyahu-Lieberman-Barak thugs come for us.


Near-death experiences 'explained'

: Scientists believe it's the last gasp of a dying brain | Mail Online
Some say they floated above their own body, others claim to have walked along a light-filled tunnel or to have been suffused with a sense of peace.

But rather than being a brush with the afterlife, near-death experiences may simply be caused by an electrical storm in the dying brain.

A study of the brains of critically ill men and women revealed a brief burst of activity moments before death.

Researcher Lakhmir Chawla, an intensive care doctor, said: 'We think that near-death experiences could be caused by a surge of electrical energy as the brain runs out of oxygen.
Near-death experiences may be caused by a surge of electrical activity in the brain moments before death

Near-death experiences may be caused by a surge of electrical activity in the brain moments before death

As blood flow slows down and oxygen levels fall, the brain cells fire one last electrical impulse.

'It starts in one part of the brain and spreads in a cascade and this may give people vivid mental sensations.'

Dr Chawla, of the George Washington University medical centre in Washington DC, monitored the brain activity of seven terminally-ill people to ensure the painkillers they were being given were working.

In each case, the gradual tailing off of brain activity in the hour or so before death was interrupted by a brief spurt of action, lasting from 30 seconds to three minutes.

Levels were similar to those seen in fully-conscious people - even though blood pressure was so low as to be undetectable - and could generate vivid images and feelings, said the researcher.

Writing in the Journal of Palliative Medicine, he said: 'We speculate that in those patients who are successfully revived, they may recall the images and memories triggered by this cascade.

'We offer this as a potential explanation for the clarity in which many patients have "out of body" experiences when successfully revived from a near-death event.'

Research released last month put near-death experiences down to high levels of carbon dioxide in the blood altering the chemical balance of the brain and tricking it into 'seeing' things.

A previous study found that almost one in five heart attack patients whose lives were saved reported having near-death experiences.

These included out-of-body experiences, pleasant feelings, seeing a tunnel, a light, deceased relatives or their life 'flashing before their eyes'.

Southampton University researchers are trying to pin down whether the experiences have a medical explanation by asking 1,500 heart attack patients to recall any memories after their cardiac arrest.

In one test, pictures that can be seen only from above are being placed on high shelves in resuscitation rooms in 25 UK and U.S. hospitals.

If any patients can recall the images, it will suggest a genuine out-of-body experience. Lead researcher Dr Sam Parnia said: 'We see death as a moment but actually it is a process which modern medicine can often reverse.

Death starts when the heart stops beating, but we can intervene and bring people back to life, sometimes even after three to four hours when they are kept very cold.

'It could be that a far higher proportion of people have near-death experiences but don't remember them.'

He added that Dr Chawla had not provided proof that the electrical surges he recorded were linked to near-death experiences, saying: 'Since all the patients died, we cannot tell what they were experiencing.'