Instagram

Translate

Monday, May 31, 2010

Robert McJannett: It is clearly not possible to receive a fair trial in the Bali justice system

Schapelle Corby wants a baby behind bars | News.com.au
Meanwhile, an Australian man who has arrived home after five months in a Bali jail for drug offences has called on the Rudd Government to bring Corby home.

Robert McJannett, a prominent trade unionist and former political candidate, hit out at Indonesian authorities when he arrived in Perth on the weekend.

"For the past five months, I have witnessed blackmail, bribery and corruption on an unprecedented scale. It is clearly not possible to receive a fair trial in the Bali justice system,'' he said.

Mr McJannett urged the Federal Government to intervene in the Corby case.

"I call on the Prime Minister and Foreign Minister in this election year to bring Schapelle home, before it's too late,'' he said.

Corby was caught at Bali's airport in October 2004 with 4.1kg of marijuana in her boogie board bag.

Earlier this year she applied for presidential clemency, saying she was suffering from depression that could endanger her life.

Clemency decisions in Indonesian can take months.

McJannett was arrested at Bali's airport on December 28, 2009 with 1.7 grams of marijuana in his luggage.

The 48-year-old was released from jail on Friday after serving five months.

With The Courier-Mail and AAP


Calls for internet access to be enshrined as a fundamental right

Calls for internet access to be enshrined as a fundamental right
Internet use has become so woven into everyday life that some technology experts say online access should be legally protected, even to the point of considering it a human right.

''It's a social inclusion question,'' said Cyberspace Law and Policy Centre executive director David Vaile, who is alarmed film and music companies have sought to require internet service providers to disconnect individual accounts over unproven piracy allegations.

Mr Vaile said removing online access would potentially disenfranchise people from society. Australian copyright provisions allowing ''fair use'' were substantially less forgiving than US laws and threatened consumers here with losing their online access.

''The number of people who could be chucked off like this is quite huge,'' Mr Vaile said.

Almost two-thirds of Australian homes - more than 5 million households - now have broadband access, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

The federal government wants to expand this access via the planned $43 billion national broadband network, which aims to connect 90 per cent of Australian homes to a high-speed network of 100 megabits per second. The rest would be connected using wireless and satellite technologies.

The call to safeguard online access is not without precedent. In France and Greece, consumers have a legal right to internet access. In Finland and Estonia, it has been enshrined as a human right. Earlier this year, the BBC commissioned a GlobeScan survey of more than 27,000 people in 26 countries that found 79 per cent of adults regarded online access as a fundamental right.

Internet community activist Brett Solomon, the former head of GetUp! and now executive director of AccessNow.org in the US, backed Mr Vaile's call to safeguard online access.

''Access to the internet is both a gateway to other rights and a right unto itself,'' Mr Solomon said, describing it as ''essential to the enjoyment of one's basic human rights''. He said online access was central to freedom of expression. ''Without access … citizens cannot fully participate in modern democracy,'' he said.

Australian Human Rights Commission president Catherine Branson, QC, said the commission had not yet looked at internet access as a human right. But it did recognise internet access may raise issues ''relevant to the right to freedom of expression'' as defined in a United Nations covenant on civil and political rights.


welfare claim process confusing Aussies

Welfare claim process too confusing for many Australians
More than 168,000 people are missing out on parenting, carer and disability payments worth $623 million a year because it is too complicated to claim welfare benefits that many eligible Australians are unaware even exist, the Australia Institute has found.

As the federal government moves to toughen access to the Newstart allowance, requiring new jobseekers to present fortnightly to Centrelink, the Missing Out report found the money the government saved because eligible people did not claim was 1½ times the amount it lost to cheats in 2008.

David Baker, an Australia Institute research fellow, said the government and opposition were ''playing to preconceptions of welfare recipients'' in an election year, but this only added to the stigma that stopped many legitimate recipients from claiming. The executive director of Anglicare, Kasy Chambers, said government assistance was provided for good reason and the system needed to be changed if people were failing to navigate through the bureaucracy.
"That's a mean way for our government to aim to 'save' money,'' she said.

Analysing four Centrelink payments, the report found the biggest reasons for people not claiming entitlements were the complexity of the claims process with long, elaborate forms; stigma; and lack of awareness.

One in five people who qualified for the carer allowance, worth up to $2615 a year, did not claim it, largely because they were not aware it existed.

The Australia Institute calculated that more than 30,000 families were missing out on the parenting payment, or 6 per cent of the 500,000 families eligible. The payment is worth $392 a fortnight for single parents and $165 for couples with young children.

The two-week bereavement allowance, paid to those whose partner had died, was largely unclaimed. Only $2 million was paid in 2007-08, far less than the $19 million the researchers calculated should have been paid if another 7100 people who were eligible had been aware of it.

Centrelink is increasing its data matching to identify overpayments and fraud, but the same methods could also be used to identify people who qualify for payments and were not receiving them, the report said.

It called for the Australian National Audit Office to investigate ways the welfare system could be simplified, as the British government has done through a ''simplification'' unit within its pensions department.

Employment services that the government contracts to place people in work under the Job Services Australia program could also assist people through the application maze.

Ms Chambers said the Henry tax review had also found the benefits system was inconsistent and complicated, and the Australia Institute report was further evidence it should be reformed.

The report found 26 per cent of pensioner and healthcare concession card holders were embarrassed to use the card, and 14 per cent of low-income households said they deliberately did not use their card because of the stigma attached.

''Increasing requirements to attend Centrelink when they have other things to do is likely to have a further negative effect on people claiming the benefits they are entitled to,'' Mr Baker said of the Newstart rule change.

Ms Chambers said the government had fallen silent on social inclusion in an election year.

"That's a mean way for our government to aim to 'save' money,'' she said.

Analysing four Centrelink payments, the report found the biggest reasons for people not claiming entitlements were the complexity of the claims process with long, elaborate forms; stigma; and lack of awareness.

One in five people who qualified for the carer allowance, worth up to $2615 a year, did not claim it, largely because they were not aware it existed.

The Australia Institute calculated that more than 30,000 families were missing out on the parenting payment, or 6 per cent of the 500,000 families eligible. The payment is worth $392 a fortnight for single parents and $165 for couples with young children.

The two-week bereavement allowance, paid to those whose partner had died, was largely unclaimed. Only $2 million was paid in 2007-08, far less than the $19 million the researchers calculated should have been paid if another 7100 people who were eligible had been aware of it.

Centrelink is increasing its data matching to identify overpayments and fraud, but the same methods could also be used to identify people who qualify for payments and were not receiving them, the report said.

It called for the Australian National Audit Office to investigate ways the welfare system could be simplified, as the British government has done through a ''simplification'' unit within its pensions department.

Employment services that the government contracts to place people in work under the Job Services Australia program could also assist people through the application maze.

Ms Chambers said the Henry tax review had also found the benefits system was inconsistent and complicated, and the Australia Institute report was further evidence it should be reformed.

The report found 26 per cent of pensioner and healthcare concession card holders were embarrassed to use the card, and 14 per cent of low-income households said they deliberately did not use their card because of the stigma attached.

''Increasing requirements to attend Centrelink when they have other things to do is likely to have a further negative effect on people claiming the benefits they are entitled to,'' Mr Baker said of the Newstart rule change.

Ms Chambers said the government had fallen silent on social inclusion in an election year.





They eat an apple

Sent from my BlackBerry®powered by Sinyal Kuat INDOSAT

Abstract

Sent from my BlackBerry®powered by Sinyal Kuat INDOSAT