Instagram

Translate

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Why Obama isn't cheering for France's new socialist president

You might think the Obama White House would be cheering for Francois Hollande, the Socialist Party leader who just won France's presidential election. Obama's no socialist, except in the eyes of the "tea party" right; but Hollande's economic policies -- especially his desire for more stimulus instead of Europe's current bent for austerity -- are just what the White House has been asking for. And in an election year, you'' think any victory for a center-left party would bolster Democrats.
Instead, the Obama administration was of two minds about France's election. A few American diplomats were even rooting privately for Nicolas Sarkozy, the conservative incumbent, to win. Why?
From the standpoint of U.S. foreign policy, Hollande could mean trouble. Sarkozy's domestic policies weren't anything like Obama's, but internationally he was the most pro-American leader France has seen in a long time.
Sarkozy aligned French policy with the United States on several important issues. He kept French troops in Afghanistan despite domestic pressure to withdraw. He was as tough as the Americans on Iran -- maybe even tougher. He helped lead Europe and the United States into a war to topple Libyan dictator Moammar Kadafi.  He was so openly pro-U.S. that he was nicknamed "Sarko the American" at home.
Hollande ran against those policies -- albeit moderately. During his campaign, the socialist leader promised to speed up France's withdrawal from Afghanistan to bring troops home by the end of 2012, a year ahead of NATO's schedule. He questioned France's return to NATO's military command structure, one of Sarkozy's pro-American moves. And he said he's "reticent"" about a U.S.-promoted European missile defense project. (On the other hand, Hollande did say he would continue Sarkozy's tough policies on Iran and Syria.)
Even on economic policy, where Hollande's policies are what Obama wanted, it's not all good news. The new French leader has promised to renegotiate Europe's fiscal pact. "Not possible," the austerity-loving German government of Angela Merkel warned on Monday. There's one thing the Obama administration likes even less than austerity -- and that's the prospect of a renewed financial crisis.
Obama and Hollande will get a chance to smooth over any differences and declare a new era of Franco-American friendship very soon. France's new president is due at Camp David for his first G-8 summit on May 18.

What lesson the US gets from Hollande's triumph




Europe's election: Lessons for the U.S.?
STORY HIGHLIGHTS

    NEW: President Obama invites France's new president to the White House
    Results of French and Greek elections have implications for U.S. economy
    France's president-elect says he plans to pull troops out of Afghanistan this year
    Sarkozy was one of the most America-friendly French presidents in decades

(CNN) -- The U.S. economy is currently on autopilot: A sharply polarized Congress and a tapped out Federal Reserve can't do much more to stimulate it this year.

But the economy may still hit turbulence after voters in France and Greece delivered a resounding anti-austerity message over the weekend to their governments.

That message, say analysts, is likely to have implications for the United States that extend from its fragile economy to its planned withdrawal from Afghanistan.

The first sign of a possible issue could come as early as Monday when U.S. markets open.

"A change in leadership brings uncertainty because you don't know exactly what you're getting into," said Ryan Detrick, senior technical strategist at Schaeffer's Investment Research.


What's next for Greek voters?

"It won't be a be-all end-all sell signal, but new leadership in France could cause investor jitters that reverberate through global financial markets."

Even the news Friday that Nicolas Sarkozy, one of the most America-friendly French presidents in decades, may lose to socialist Francois Hollande appeared to play a role in the market's movement. After nearing four-year highs at the start of the week, U.S. stocks ended with a thud on Friday as the S&P 500 logged its biggest weekly decline of the year.

Hollande swept to victory Sunday, becoming France's first-left wing president since Francois Mitterand left office in 1995.

That was followed by news that voters in Greece dealt major blows to the country's two most established parties in parliamentary elections, leaving no party with anything approaching a majority.

The message from voters in both countries appeared to be the same: The current policy of deficit-cutting, reduced spending and cuts to benefits and public services is unacceptable.

The election results leave in question what happens now to the eurozone and its debt crisis. France is a key player in plans to navigate it. And Greece is a recipient of bailout by the European Central Bank that requires the government to slash spending.

The European Union is America's largest trading partner. The U.S. economy has suffered in the slow down in European markets, and further economic problems in the eurozone could mean less trade with the United States.

Outside of the economy, the election of Hollande poses serious questions about the diplomatic and military relationship between the United States and France.

With Sarkozy, the United States enjoyed support in its positions on Syria, Iran and Afghanistan. Sarkozy was a proponent of the NATO air campaign in Libya.

But with Hollande, there is no guarantee that the United States can count on support.

Hollande campaigned on the promise to pull France's troops from Afghanistan by the end of the year, two years ahead of a planned withdrawal that was choreographed to coincide with U.S. plans.

During the campaign, Hollande also raised questions about Sarkozy's decision in 2009 to place French troops under NATO command.

Hollande can expect NATO leaders to urge him to change or soften his position when he attends a summit in Chicago later this month where the focus will be on Afghanistan.

President Barack Obama called Hollande shortly after results were announced to congratulate the president-elect and invite him to the White House.

While any talks between the two leaders will likely to focus on diplomatic and economic relations, Obama is probably taking a lesson from the outcome of the French election.

Obama, like Sarkozy, is campaigning for re-election amid a faltering economy, high unemployment and voter discontent over spending and cuts.

CNN's Hibah Yousuf, Alan Silverleib and Chelsea J. Carter contributed to this report.

Hollande is the normal French President

    Francois Hollande, France's new 'President Normal'

    1 hr 25 mins ago - AFP 1:35 | 110 views

    The moment France's president-elect Francois Hollande is sworn in on Tuesday, he leaves his cosy post-election no-man's land for potentially bruising encounters on the European and world stage. A profile of Hollande. Duration: 01:34

Here's why Canadians should pay attention to the French election:

There's a large number of French citizens in Canada:

According a Embassy Magazine, there are approximately 80,000 French citizens in Canada, the majority living in Quebec (including NDP leader Thomas Mulcair).

About 46,000 registered to vote for the Presidential election in 2007.

More economic trouble in Europe could mean economic trouble in Canada:

According to the Associated Press, a Hollande victory could reshape the debate and undo pacts already agreed upon in the the 17-nation Eurozone. Until now, France and Germany — led by Sarkozy and Angela Merkel — have set the agenda on how best to restore troubled state finances and sluggish growth across the continent.

The "Merkozy" solution: cheap funding from the European Central Bank and more cost-cutting to bring down debts and reassure markets.

Hollande's solution: government-sponsored stimulus to revive growth and punish the banks with higher rates and taxes.

CNN's Cyrus Sanati says a Hollande win could have dire consequences for the international community.

"The election of Socialist party leader Francois Hollande to France's top job this coming Sunday would introduce an air of instability into the global economy at a time when it desperately needs a steady hand," he wrote.

"It took almost two years for the [European Central Bank] to get over its fear of hyperinflation and finally open the spigots. If Hollande refuses to go along with this economic deal with the devil then a worst-case scenario could play out: Bank failures in Italy, Spain and Greece, and even in Germany and France, leading to high yields and crippling sovereign defaults across the eurozone. The euro would be finished. U.S. and Asian financial firms with European exposure would get hit hard, setting off a panic that would make 2008 look like a pleasant stroll along the Champs-Élysées."

International relations may buoy Canada in to a bigger role:

The next leader sets a five-year course for France, a wealthy and influential country with a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council.

According to an article by the Associated Press, Sarkozy has aligned with both Washington and Ottawa on Iran and Syria, upped France's military presence in Afghanistan and took a major role in NATO's air campaign over Libya that helped oust dictator Moammar Gadhafi.

"Hollande, with virtually no foreign policy experience, wants to bring French troops from Afghanistan home early and might be less vigorous in flexing military or diplomatic muscle abroad," notes the column.

If France does in fact abate its role in NATO, countries like Canada may have to step-up with more troops and more resources.

Back in France, citizens continue to have mixed reactions to the news of their new president:

Among them: What happens in Europe affects us, America's influence is on the decline

Ira Stoll | May 7, 2012

Growth beats austerity. "Austerity isn't inevitable. My mission now is to give European construction a growth dimension," Mr. Hollandesaid on election night. As other commentators have observed, the definition of austerity in Europe has become somewhat muddled. It has been taken to mean everything from an increase in the income tax rate to 50% (the not-so-genius idea of Britain's Conservative Party prime minister, David Cameron) to genuinely needed trims in benefits for public employees and welfare beneficiaries. But the lesson for American politicians is nonetheless clear. Voters need to be able to hear a message about economic growth, not only about pain and burden-sharing and budget-cutting and entitlement reform.

You can't tax and spend and divide your way to growth. Monday's slump in French stock prices, rise in French bond yields, and drop in the Euro as measured against the dollar are all signs that the market has no confidence in either Mr. Hollande's proposals or his tone. The proposals — hire 60,000 more government-employed teachers, raise taxes to 75% on anyone earning more than 1 million Euros a year, or about $1.3 million — amount to taxing and spending. They stem from an ideology that, for all the hopeful chatter in the press about Mr. Hollande's supposed moderation, is a career politician's hostility to private sector success. Frédéric Filloux wrote, "the new president claimed '[he] doesn't like rich people' (a few years ago, he assigned a threshold of wealth to the equivalent of $60,000 a year)." Good luck constructing a "growth dimension" with that attitude.

Voters punish conservatives who don't deliver. As the Wall Street Journal put it in an editorial, "Mr. Sarkozy and his government responded by raising sales and capital-gains taxes, demonizing successful French businessmen, complaining that Germans work too hard, urging an international financial-transactions tax and trying to pin much of the blame for economic troubles on immigrants." Bloomberg Businessweek reports on a survey it said "showed that 73 percent of Hollande voters supported him because they wanted to punish Sarkozy. Only 44 percent said they agreed with the Socialist candidate's ideas." George H.W. Bush must be hoping that Sarkozy replaces him as every conservative columnist's go-to example of a tax-raising, election-losing, supposedly right-of-center politician.

America's influence is diminished. There was a moment, not all that long ago, when a Europe facing a financial crisis would look to America for leadership, or even a rescue. For better or worse, those days are past, as America's own resources are sufficiently stretched or depleted that any serious effort by America to assist — not to bail out, but to assist — Europe would face formidable practical and political hurdles.

Europe affects us. Any American celebrating Europe's woes on the grounds that it makes it less likely that that continent would emerge as a global rival to America is misguided. A Europe mired in socialism is likely to be a less healthy market for American exports, and a weak Europe drags down everything from America's tourist economy to America's retirement savings accounts. It's an interconnected global economy we are part of, not a zero-sum competition. A lot of Americans are now employed by European companies, or by American companies that sell things to European consumers.

Culture and nationhood matter. For all the talk of how interconnected the global economy is and how the world is "flat," France is still France, not some generic "Europe" or the West. For all the talk from Mitt Romney about how President Obama wants to turn America into a European-style social welfare state, America would never elect a self-proclaimed socialist who wants to increase taxes on the "rich" to 75% and who left the mother of his four children to go live with a twice-divorced journalist ten years his junior.

Right?

Ira Stoll is editor of FutureOfCapitalism.com and author of Samuel Adams: A Life

cnn
Justin Vaïsse writes:

François Hollande did not thank his opponent, Nicolas Sarkozy, during his acceptance speech Sunday night, after defeating the incumbent with 51.6% of the vote in the French presidential runoff. But he should have, as he ran an anti-Sarkozy campaign, promising to behave like a "normal president" in contrast to the impulsive, unpredictable and sometimes ostentatious Sarkozy. And it worked: Fifty-five percent of the voters who cast a ballot for him did it to defeat Sarkozy rather than to elect Hollande.

Hollande, betting on the anti-Sarkozy mood, refrained from making big promises, and even his signature reforms had a lot of fine print. For example, he announced that he would recruit 60,000 more teachers -- but by shifting existing civil service jobs from other ministries to education. He promised to roll back Sarkozy's pension reform -- but for only a tiny fraction of workers. He pledged to renegotiate the European Fiscal Compact Treaty that Sarkozy negotiated with Merkel -- but only to add a growth stimulus, not to alter the new disciplines it imposes.

His prudence is easy enough to explain: French debt is close to 90% of GDP, the 2011 deficit was 5.2%, and Hollande has promised to rein it in to 3% in 2013 and zero in 2017 (Sarkozy was promising 2016). He will be closely monitored by the bond markets and the rating agencies, one of which stripped France of its triple-A in January.

That is precisely one of the three big challenges Hollande will face: to convince markets he can chart a fiscally responsible course and restore the competitiveness of France's economy while its southern neighbors are reforming fast and Germany is already very competitive. This in turn partly depends on a second challenge he faces: fashioning a new Franco-German, and then pan-European, consensus on the eurozone crisis.

Facebook IPO 101

via Yahoo News

After months of hype Facebook (FB) is expected to become a publicly traded stock at the end of this week. The richly valued company may not be for every investor, but those who've decided they need to own shares of the social media giant should know the right and wrong ways to buy the next hot stock. The frenzy surrounding any highly anticipated IPO can lead investors into mistakes that cost them real money. Josh Brown, author of Backstage Wall Street and editor of theReformedBroker.com, has some tips on how to buy Facebook shares.
1. Avoid "Facebook Funds"
Contrary to what you might hear, the funds and companies that already have Facebook stakes aren't likely to suddenly shoot up in value when the stock starts trading. Don't believe anyone who tells you to buy some company that either has an investment in or is "like" Facebook. Stick to the real deal.
"Avoid any kind of indirect way of owning it, just own it," Brown emphasizes. That's what the company going public is all about.
2. Use a Limit Order
Placing a limit order means you're setting a ceiling on how much you'll pay per share. This is in contrast to a market order where you buy stock at any price.
If you place a market order, you end up owning shares wherever the stock is trading at that very instant. On the first day of trading for a hot IPO, swings of 25% or more aren't uncommon. Obviously you don't want to be at the high end of that range.
The success or failure of your Facebook investment may ride on deciding in advance how much you're willing to pay per share. The best way to do that is by placing a limit order.
3. Only Use Your Risk Money
Facebook is an exciting company, but the potential share price—targeted to price between $28 to $35 each—already reflects some of that enthusiasm. You shouldn't put all your eggs in one basket under any circumstance, especially for a hot IPO.
"This is not the money you're going to use in two years to buy a house!" cautions Brown. A controlled investment is one where "if you're wrong and it gets cut in half, you won't be happy, but it won't change the way you live."
4. Don't Buy at the Open
Brown says in a lot of cases company insiders can sell their shares three to six months after a company goes public. When that supply of stock comes flooding onto the market, stocks can take a temporary hit, making it an ideal time for outsiders to scoop up shares.
"In Facebook's case, I'm not 100% sure that the insiders are going to come out with that many shares to sell," says Brown. In other words, even though he thinks investors need to know they are "grossly overpaying" for shares, they need to start buying the right way.
Following the steps above won't make owning Facebook any less risky than buying shares of any other stock, but they should help you to not get burned on the first day. In this case, having a precise plan may make all the difference to make money on your investment.
Are you planning to buy Facebook (FB) shares within the first month of its IPO? Please answer our poll question below and visit us on Facebook!

Monday, May 14, 2012

Petugas Bea Cukai dan Pos Indonesia suka mencuri barang yang dibeli online dari luar negeri

sumber: http://www.diptara.com/2011/08/3-peluang-korupsi-yang-sering-terjadi.html

Setelah membaca artikel Mas Aming di artikel "Stop Gratifikasi" saya jadi terusik untuk menuliskan hal yang sama. Yaitu kasus serupa tentang korupsi di Bea dan Cukai. Bedanya, kali ini yang akan saya ceritakan murni dari pengalaman saya sendiri, juga pengalaman sahabat saya yang sudah berkali-kali berurusan dengan petugas kantor Bea dan Cukai.

Kalau Anda sering belanja barang online (e-commerce) ke luar negeri tentu tidak asing lagi dan pasti akan berurusan dengan yang namanya kantor Bea dan Cukai. Jadi tidak hanya waktu berpergian ke luar negeri saja yang harus berurusan dengan Bea dan Cukai. Karena, alur pengiriman barang (paket) dari luar negeri sebelum sampai ke tempat tujuan Anda akan discreening pemerikasaan dulu di kantor Bea dan Cukai yang ada di kota Anda, baru kemudian dikirimkan ke alamat Anda.

Lalu apa saja peluang kecurangan atau korupsi yang sering terjadi di kantor Bea dan Cukai? Berikut ini adalah beberapa kecurangannya:

1. Barang ditilep

Peluang korupsi yang pertama ini bukan merugikan negara tapi merugikan wajib pajak. Ini yang pernah saya alami. Yaitu barang saya diutil (baca ditilep) 1 pcs saat diperiksa Bea dan Cukai sebelum dikirimkan Pak Pos ke alamat saya. Saya pernah pesan barang buat dagangan online saya ke situs Alibaba. Pesanan saya jumlahnya 10 pcs. Waktu saya buka di rumah ternyata quantitynya sudah berkurang satu, tinggal 9 pcs.

Pertanyaannya, apa mungkin pengirimannya dari Alibaba hanya 9 pcs? Saya pastikan tidak karena dipackingnya saya amati dengan seksama posisi dusnya untuk 10 pcs barang. Ada bukti dusnya sedikit longgar, pas untuk 1 pcs. Jadi saya bisa memastikan dari sananya memang sudah dikirim pas 10 pcs.

Tips untuk menghindari barang Anda ditilep. Saat kurir atau petugas Pos mengantar paket ke rumah Anda, silahkan langsung dibuka dengan disaksikan petugas Pos atau kurirnya yang kirim barang. Dokumentasikan dengan difoto dan bila perlu buatkan Berita Acara dengan ditandatangai bersama Pak Posnya jika barangnya berkurang. Ini untuk memudahkan Anda komplin keberatan ke kantor Bea dan Cukainya dan agar mereka tidak mengelak.

2. Besaran pajak dikecilkan

Peluang korupsi yang kedua, yaitu memainkan besaran harga di pajak bea masuknya. Karena, seperti kita tahu besaran pajak ditentukan berdasarkan prosentase angka taksiran harga barangnya. Lalu peluang korupsinya ada dimana? Ada di besaran pungutan pajaknya yang sengaja disunat. Caranya, laporan pajaknya dikecilin dari pengenaan pajak yang sesungguhnya.

Hem, Anda masih bingung? Saya ambil contoh barang paket senilai Rp 1.210.000 maka pajak Bea masuknya akan dikenakan PPN sebesar 10% kemudian terkena Pph Pasal 22 sebesar 7.5% sehingga total besaran pajak yang seharusnya disetorkan ke kas negara adalah sebesar Rp 212 ribu. Lalu, ini contoh, oleh Bea dan Cukai laporan nilai barangnya sengaja direduse menjadi, misalnya Rp 1 juta sehingga besaran pajaknya akan lebih rendah lagi. Selisihnya ditilep masuk kantong pribadi petugas Bea dan Cukainya.

Tips agar peluang korupsi ini tidak terjadi, bayarkan pajaknya langsung ke kantor Pos. Jangan melalui petugas Bea dan Cukainya. Sebab, kalau sudah Anda setorkan langsung ke kantor Pos maka uang setoran pajak Anda saya bisa pastikan akan aman masuk ke kas negara.

3. Kongkalikong dengan wajib pajak

Korupsi yang ketiga ini juga seringkali terjadi. Yaitu terjadi kongkalikong antara petugas Bea dan Cukai dengan wajib pajaknya. Seperti saya sebutkan di nomor dua, penentuan pajak bea masuk di Bea dan Cukai ditentukan oleh petugasnya dengan mentaksir nilai barangnya. Biasanya itu bisa dinego kalau kebetulan taksiran harganya keliru, misal kemahalan.

Nah, peluang korupsinya wajib pajak buat kesepakatan di bawah tangan dengan petugas Bea dan Cukai untuk mereduse (mengecilkan) nilai pajaknya menjadi bebas pajak. Wajib pajak hanya membayar senilai 50% dari pajak yang seharusnya dia bayarkan ke kas negara kepada petugas Bea dan Cukainya. Jadi negara tidak dapat apa-apa karena pajak tidak masuk kas negara tapi masuk ke rekening pribadi petugas Bea dan Cukainya.

Contoh, saya punya teman yang jadi importir barang dari Korea dan juga buka Jasa Pembelian Barang ke Luar Negeri dan melakukan kecurangan (kongkalikong) ini dengan kepala kantor Bea dan Cukainya. Teman saya ini cerita mengeluh ke saya. Sudah dapat untung dari hasil korupsi seperti itu, dan barangnya sering diutil tapi kepala Bea dan Cukainya masih juga minta upeti macam-macam. Weleh-weleh!

Itulah 3 Peluang Korupsi Yang Sering Terjadi di Bea dan Cukai. Semoga tulisan ini bermanfaat buat yang belum pernah atau tidak punya pengalaman belanja barang ke luar negeri. Dan apabila post ini dibaca oleh orang Bea dan Cukai, semoga Anda menjadi tersadar dan segera kembali ke jalan yang benar tidak korupsi lagi. Amin.