Instagram

Translate

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Maikel Nabil Sanad

Jailed Egyptian blogger on hunger strike says 'he is ready to die' | World news | The Guardian
An Egyptian blogger jailed for criticising the country's military junta has declared himself ready to die, as his hunger strike enters its 57th day.

"If the militarists thought that I would be tired of my hunger strike and accept imprisonment and enslavement, then they are dreamers," said Maikel Nabil Sanad, in a statement announcing that he would boycott the latest court case against him, which began last Thursday. "It's more honourable [for] me to die committing suicide than [it is] allowing a bunch of Nazi criminals to feel that they succeeded in restricting my freedom. I am bigger than that farce."

Sanad, whom Amnesty International has declared to be a prisoner of conscience, was sentenced by a military tribunal in March to three years in jail after publishing a blog post entitled "The people and the army were never on one hand". The online statement, which deliberately inverted a popular pro-military chant, infuriated Egypt's ruling generals who took power after the ousting of former president Hosni Mubarak, and have since been accused of multiple human rights violations in an effort to shut down legitimate protest and stifle revolutionary change.

The 26-year-old was found guilty of "insulting the Egyptian army". The case helped spark a nationwide opposition movement to military trials for civilians, and cast further doubt on the intentions of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (Scaf), whose promises regarding Egypt's post-Mubarak transition to democracy appear increasingly hollow.

Earlier this month, a military appeals court bowed to public pressure and ordered a retrial of Sanad. But they insisted it would once again take the form of a military tribunal, which international human rights organisations have condemned as falling short of the basic standards of legal justice. Up to 12,000 civilians are believed to have been tried in such courts since the fall of Mubarak, and the practice has continued despite a commitment this month from Egypt's de facto leader, Field Marshal Tantawi, to bring such trials to an end.

The military retrial opened in the absence of Sanad, his family and his lawyers. Sanad's younger brother Mark said they were refusing to participate in a "soap opera".

"Military tribunals are one of the most important tools used by Scaf to put an end to the ongoing wave of protests against them," claimed Mona Seif, a cancer researcher who has helped lead a campaign against the practice. "Sanad's case was one of the earliest, and it was a warning message to anyone thinking of exposing Scaf's crimes."

Sanad's health is believed to be in critical condition, and Amnesty has warned that his life "hangs in the balance".

Amnesty said: "Maikel Nabil Sanad's trial has been rife with flaws and unnecessary delays, and the decision of the appeals court for a retrial brings him back to square one, cruelly toying with his life. The charges against him must be dropped and he should be released immediately and unconditionally. He should never have been tried in the first place, let alone before a military court."

Mobilising support for Sanad has been hampered by the fact that he previously expressed pro-Israeli sentiments on his blog. "Scaf targeted him in particular because they knew it would be difficult to get a groundswell of sympathy for him, but the tide has turned now," argued Seif. "Most people are opposed to Scaf's military tribunals, and Sanad himself would rather walk slowly to death than acknowledge their legitimacy."

In his latest blog post, Sanad reiterated his refusal to engage with the military's legal "theatrics", saying: "I don't beg for my freedom from a group of killers and homeland-stealers." He went on to denounce an apology his father made on his behalf to Scaf in an unsuccessful effort to secure his release.

"The military council is the one that has to apologise for my imprisonment, my torture, silencing my mouth, spying on my life, my relatives and my friends," he wrote. "The military council is the one that has to apologise [for] its crimes of killing, torturing and unlawful prosecutions."

"Where is Cuomo? Protecting the 1%!"

Hope Naomi Wolf  is okay. I like some of her books. It opens my mind of what is happening in this injustice global system
Naomi Wolf arrested at Occupy Wall Street protest in New York | World news | guardian.co.uk
Naomi Wolf, the celebrated feminist author and campaigner, has been arrested at an Occupy Wall Street protest outside an awards ceremony held to honour New York's governor.

Wolf and a companion were led away in handcuffs from the street in front of Skylight Studios in Manhattan.

Inside, New York state governor Andrew Cuomo was presented with the "game changer of the year" award from the Huffington Post website, for which Wolf is a contributor.

She was detained after ignoring police warnings to stay off the street in front of the building and where a crowd of about 50 Occupy Wall Street protesters had gathered.

Wolf had been at the event, hosted by Huffington Post founder Arianna Huffington and attended by a number of celebrities, including the reality TV star Kim Kardashian, who was presented with a "business leader" award.

The protesters arrived at the event in Soho to demonstrate their support of a "millionaires tax", which Cuomo, a Democrat, opposes.

According to Ryan Devereaux, a reporter for the liberal TV news organisation Democracy Now, some chanted: "Where is Cuomo? Protecting the 1%!"

There was a dispute with police, who said they were blocking the sidewalk. Wolf came and told them they "didn't need a permit for a megaphone".

According to another witness, Wolf objected to a police officer's assertion that the group were blocking the street. "Tell it to the judge," the officer is reported to have said.

It was unclear what charges Wolf, author of the best-selling book The Beauty Myth, might face. Most people detained during the month-long protests have been arrested on misdemeanors.

Witnesses said protesters marched on a nearby police precinct, where they chanted and sang songs. A police officer came out of the building and used the protesters' now-famous "human mic" call-and-response system to tell them that Wolf had been released from another precinct, after being issued with a summons.

Earlier in the evening, it was revealed that a New York Police Department investigation had censured a police officer who used pepper spray on Occupy Wall Street protesters last month.

Deputy Inspector Anthony Bologna faces losing 10 vacation days after the incident on 24 September near Union Square, shortly after the protests began in lower Manhattan, according to the Associated Press.

Video from the protests shows a small group of mostly women corralled by orange netting used by officers to control crowds. Bologna approaches and seemingly without warning blasted a cluster of women with pepper spray. Two of the women crumple on the sidewalk in pain. One screams.

The incident sparked outrage by demonstrators and helped propel the movement into the media spotlight.

Malaria vaccine could save millions of children's lives

| Society | The Guardian
Millions of children's lives could be saved by a new vaccine shown to halve the risk of malaria in the first large-scale trials across seven African countries.

The long-awaited results of the largest-ever malaria vaccine study, involving 15,460 babies and small children, show that it could massively reduce the impact of the much-feared killer disease. Malaria takes nearly 800,000 lives a year – mostly children under five. It damages many more.

The vaccine has been in development for two decades – the brainchild of scientists at the UK drug company GlaxoSmithKline, which has promised to sell it at no more than a fraction over cost-price, with the excess being ploughed back into further tropical disease research.

"This data brings us to the cusp of having the world's first malaria vaccine, which has the potential to significantly improve the outlook for children living in malaria endemic regions across Africa," said GSK's chief executive, Andrew Witty.

"The addition of a malaria vaccine to existing control interventions, such as bed nets and insecticide spraying, could potentially help prevent millions of cases of this debilitating disease. It could also reduce the burden on hospital services, freeing up much-needed beds to treat other patients who often live in remote villages, with little or no access to healthcare."

Witty told the Guardian he was thrilled for the scientists, who were thought by many of their peers to be attempting the impossible when they started work on a vaccine 25 years ago. "When the team was first shown the data, quite a number of them broke down in tears," he said. "It was the emotion of what they had achieved – the first vaccine against a parasitic form of infection. They were overwhelmed. It says something about the amount of heart that has gone into this project."

In an indication of the weight of expectation around this vaccine, still known only as RTS,S, the results were announced at a malaria forum in Seattle called by Bill and Melinda Gates, attended by the World Health Organisation director general, Margaret Chan, and the UK development secretary, Andrew Mitchell. The results were published at the same time online by the New England Journal of Medicine.

Mitchell said a vaccine "offers real hope for the future", adding: "An effective, long-lasting and cost-effective vaccine would make a major contribution to malaria control … but we must not lose sight of the fact that over 2,000 people die from malaria every day and they need help now. Britain's focus remains on driving down this terrible loss of life by preventing and treating malaria with the tools we have now and tackling resistance."

Small-scale studies, in a few hundred children, have shown promising results in the past, but a trial of this size is needed to prove the vaccine's usefulness across populations. It is being carried out in Burkina Faso, Gabon, Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania.

The early data from five- to 17-month-old children is the first of three important results; the outcome from the vaccination of newborn babies will be published next year. These figures are crucial, because the malaria vaccine needs to be incorporated into the infant immunisation schedule, alongside the usual diphtheria and measles jabs. Earlier small-scale trials suggest the results in six- to 12-week-old babies will also show around 50% protection.

The third important outcome, on how well the protection lasts, will not be known until 2014. The data so far, over 22 months, suggests there may be a drop in the numbers protected from severe malaria.

The WHO has said that if the results are satisfactory, it will recommend its use and the vaccine may begin to be rolled out as early as 2015, but it will need to be used in conjunction with all the other existing tools of malaria prevention, such as bed nets and insecticide spraying on the inside of homes.

Questions remain over the price of the vaccine and whether donors will be willing to pay. Dr Regina Rabinovitch, from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, declined to say if they would fund it, saying they would want to look at the final data on efficacy, duration and safety. "Would I prefer to see a 100% effective vaccine? Certainly," she told a press conference.

Witty says he is exhorting everybody involved in the vaccine's production to pare their costs to the bone. "We are absolutely dedicated to making it as low as possible," he said.

Christopher Elias, president and chief executive of Path, a non-profit organisation that has helped fund the study, with the assistance of the Gates Foundation, said such high-quality science was moving the fight against malaria on.

"The Path malaria vaccine initiative's mission is to deliver a vaccine to the children of Africa so that instead of carrying near lifeless babies to crowded paediatric wards, mothers will carry their infants past noisy school playgrounds to bustling immunisation clinics. Today, we are an important step closer to realising that vision, and we look forward to continuing our drive, together with our partners, to bring this vaccine home to the children of Africa."

Bill Gates said a vaccine is the simplest, most cost-effective way to save lives. "These results demonstrate the power of working with partners to create a malaria vaccine that has the potential to protect millions of children from this devastating disease," he said. All the children in the trial received three doses either of vaccine or an ineffective placebo. The analysis published in the journal relates to the first 6,000 children, aged five to 17 months, to be immunised. Over the 12 months after immunisation, the vaccine reduced their risk of developing clinical malaria – meaning the high fevers and chills that need medical treatment – by 56%, and of developing severe malaria by 47%.

Severe malaria affects the brain, kidneys and blood and can kill. Most children still suffered malaria, but fewer and less serious bouts. For every 1,000 children who received the vaccine there were 750 cases of malaria over a year, compared with 1,500 per 1,000 children who were given a dummy jab. Side-effects were roughly the same in both the vaccine and placebo groups and relatively high, at around 20%, but investigators say this has to do with other health problems among rural African children.

Saturday, October 15, 2011

A Magazine Is an iPad That Does Not Work.m4v

More Americans than Chinese can’t put food on the table

 | The Lookout - Yahoo! News
The number of Americans who lack access to basic necessities like food and health care is now higher than it was at the peak of the Great Recession, a survey released Thursday found. And in a finding that could worsen fears of U.S. decline, the share of Americans struggling to put food on the table is now three times as large as the share of the Chinese population in the same position.

The United States' Basic Index Score, a Gallup measure of access to necessities, fell to 81.4 in September--even lower than the 81.5 mark it reached in February and March, 2009. The recession officially ended in June of that year, but the halting recovery hasn't given a sustained boost to the number of Americans able to provide for themselves. The government reported last month that a record number of Americans is living in poverty.

Between September 2008 and last month, the share of Americans with access to a personal doctor plummeted from 82.5 percent to 78.3 percent. The share with health insurance fell from 85.9 percent to 82.3 percent. And the share saying they had enough money to buy food for themselves and their family dropped from 81.1 percent to 80.1 percent. Gallup's surveys are based on phone and in-person interviews.

Meanwhile, Gallup found that just 6 percent of Chinese said there were times in the past 12 months when they lacked enough money for food for themselves or their family, compared to 19 percent of Americans. Just three years ago, those results were almost reversed: 16 percent of Chinese couldn't put food on the table at times, compared to 9 percent of Americans.


Thursday, October 13, 2011

Quit Whinning

I found this post I copied from this tumblr blog kind of  interesting..
We Are The 53% - My mistakes are mine, and no one else’s. I learned...


Occupy Wall Street : We are the 99 percent

By the Numbers: What the 47 Percent Who Pay No Income Tax Look Like - Yahoo! News
In response to Occupy Wall Street's protest slogan of "We are the 99 percent," conservatives have started an online counterprotest called "We are the 53 percent" -- a reference to the 53 percent of Americans who pay federal income tax, on top of the payroll, local, sales and other taxes that other Americans pay.

The Tumblr blog offers helpful suggestions to the other 47 percent, including "quit whining," "get off your duff" and "suck it up you whiners." But who are these mysterious people who don't pay income tax -- besides roughly half of the United States' taxpaying population? More importantly, how do they manage to do it?

31: Percent of nonpaying American households making $10,000 or less per year in 2010 (PDF link to study). An American household of any size making this amount of money, including just one person, is automatically under the poverty threshold.

61: Percent of nonpaying American households making $20,000 or less per year.

87: Percent of nonpaying American households making $40,000 or less per year.

$22,050: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' 2009 definition of the poverty threshold, for a family with two children living in the 48 contiguous states or the District of Columbia.

1964: The last year the minimum standard of living defined as below the poverty level was updated, for the purpose of government definitions. A number of things that are required by job-seekers and at-home workers, and that are considered vital parts of American life now, were not included because they did not exist -- things such as computers, cellphones, and Internet access.

$29,600: One proposal for what the poverty line for a family of four should be reset to, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. The proposal corrects for a number of statistical quirks in the original, including the assumption that all senior citizens would eat less.

$11,500: The standard income tax deduction for a married couple with two children. The deduction is $9,500 for a couple and $1,000 for each child, as of the tax law change in 2003.

$5,036: The Earned Income Tax Credit granted to a family with two children, according to the 2010 IRS 1040 form. The EITC is a tax break granted to people who work for a living, which grants substantially more to families with children.

16.3: Percent of their incomes that the bottom 20 percent of American earners paid in all forms of taxes combined, on average, in 2010. Some taxes, like state, local, sales, and payroll taxes, take a larger percentage of poor people's income than they do the top 1 percent's.

26.9: Percent of America's net worth owned by the entire bottom 90 percent of American earners, including home equity.

4: Job seekers for every job opening in the United States.

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Arab sectarian dynamics : Sunnis versus all religious minorities

A new sectarianism is reshaping the Arab world | Ibishblog (Hussein Ibish)
Across the Arab world, terrifying sectarian dynamics are starting to emerge, essentially pitting Arab Sunnis versus all religious minorities. The elements of this have been obvious for quite a while, but the pattern has become so pronounced and almost pervasive that it demands to be recognized no matter how frightening the prospects.

Throughout the region, political forces are lining up time and again along this extremely dangerous binary divide. For instance, the ecumenism of the Egyptian revolution has given way to the most gruesome sectarian violence between the military and Islamist mobs on the one hand and Coptic protesters on the other hand. This was particularly evident over the weekend, with deadly clashes and sectarian incitement raging throughout Cairo.

The Syrian regime has done its best to cast the uprising in that country in a sectarian light, with a disturbing degree of success. Regional support for Bashar al-Assad’s Alawite-minority rule is now almost entirely restricted to non-Sunni Arabs (as well as Iran), including Lebanon’s Hezbollah, the Shia-led Iraqi government, Shia parliamentarians and activists in Kuwait and other Gulf States, and a significant number of Christians in Lebanon and Syria.

By contrast, Assad’s alliance with Hamas, the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, has collapsed largely along sectarian lines. Support for Assad among Arab Sunnis has dropped to virtually zero, including all Sunni-dominated governments. Support for his rule has also further exacerbated the already deeply-damaged reputation of Hezbollah among Arab Sunnis.

The Sunni Arab world, meanwhile, has been largely silent about the campaign of relentless persecution and repression against the Shia majority in Bahrain, implicitly backing the oppressive rule of the Sunni-minority royal family.

Sectarian tensions simmer in Kuwait but are held at bay by the country’s wealth and small population. In Saudi Arabia, however, they have been bubbling away for months, particularly in the country’s oil-rich eastern provinces. Last week they boiled over in Al-Awamiyah, as Shia rioters were fired on by security forces. Saudi spokespersons dismissed the incident as “nonsectarian” and merely criminal in nature, but immediately undermined their arguments by blaming Iran for the unrest.

The narrative of the last few years of the previous decade—the “culture of resistance” (which supposedly included both Sunni and Shia Islamists and some Arab nationalists) versus the “culture of accommodation” (a term of abuse for all moderate or pro-Western forces in the Arab world)—has been completely subsumed by this emerging sectarian narrative.

It will be rightly objected that this scattershot analysis is superficial, and that in each society there are many detailed and specific forces at play, particularly in countries as diverse as Lebanon or Iraq. It will further be observed that there are many exceptions to this pattern, such as the role of imprisoned Sunni social democrat Ibrahim Sharif in Bahrain or the presence of Christians, Alawites and others in the Syrian opposition.

It is absolutely true that when you look at individual groves, there are many details that do not correspond to this narrative or dynamic; but it’s also plainly the new shape the broader forest is taking. I’ve been watching this pattern emerge for a long time without being willing to clearly identify it in writing, both because there are so many details that complicate, and even contradict, such a reading, and in hope that other dynamics would prevent a regional sectarian divide from becoming definitive.

I now think it’s impossible to deny that the single most important factor shaping the Arab regional dynamic is a sectarian divide, not between Sunnis and Shia, but between Sunnis and everybody else. On the sidelines are also significant divisions between Arabs and ethnic minorities such as Kurds or Berbers, but it is the sectarian split that is the real dividing line these days. This new sectarian consciousness has greatly assisted the rise of Turkey as a regional power, strongly aligned with Arab Sunnis, at least for the moment.

Iran is probably the biggest single loser in the regional realignment so far, and the mainstay of many governments trying to blame unrest on “foreign powers” (along with al Qaeda, Israel, the United States, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey, depending on which government is making excuses). However, an Arab world divided along sectarian lines will continue to provide potential openings for Iran in Shia and other non-Sunni areas, even where they have had little or no influence in the past.

The emerging sectarian narrative threatens to rip apart many Arab societies, and indeed the Arab world in general. More than military dictatorships or violent organizations that may seek to exploit these tensions, the illusions that Sunni Arabs across the region are seeking to impose a new and repressive order on non-Sunni Arabs, or that non-Sunni Arabs are subversive elements or disloyal agents of Iran or other foreign powers, pose the gravest threat to a better future in the Middle East.

These narratives are almost always implicit, but they are on the brink of becoming hegemonic. Counter-narratives, based on deeds as well as words, are more urgently needed than ever. If they wish to avoid it, Arab political and religious leaders are going to have to move quickly to prevent this stark sectarian divide from defining the regional landscape into the future.

Marzieh Vafamehr : My Tehran For Sale

can someone inform me where I can get the DVD "My Tehran For Sale"?
Iran reportedly sentences film actress to 90 lashes | The Envoy - Yahoo! News
An Iranian court has sentenced an Iranian actress to one year in jail and 90 lashes related to her role in an Australian-made film portraying social alienation, artistic repression and drug use in Iran, according to an Iranian opposition website.

"In an outcome that could have been lifted from the pages of the movie's script"--"My Tehran for Sale"--the film's lead actress, Marzieh Vafamehr, "was arrested in July and received her sentence at the weekend, according to reports quoting Iranian opposition website kalameh.com," the Sydney Morning Herald reported.

In the 2009 film, Vafamehr portrays a Tehran actress whose theater work is banned by the authorities and is thus driven to Tehran's cultural underground. Ultimately, she contemplates whether to leave Iran for exile abroad.

"Vafamehr often appears with a shaved head and no headscarf in the film, which also explores cultural oppression in Iran and taboos such as drug use," the paper said.

Vafamehr's attorney has reportedly appealed the sentence which was handed down on Saturday. Technically, she was accused of participating in a film whose shooting did not have the required permits. However, both the film's director and the actress's filmmaker husband Nasser Taghvai said the charge is baseless.

"The accusations against Marzieh have no grounds," Granaz Moussavi, the Melbourne-based Iranian-Australian director of the film, said in a statement Tuesday, the AP reported. "All the documentation has been provided to the Iranian court to show that permits were in place for the production of the film."

Australian Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd also expressed concern about the sentence Tuesday.

"The Australian government condemns the use of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment and is deeply concerned by reports that Ms. Marzieh Vafamehr has been sentenced to one year in jail and 90 lashes for her role in an Australian-produced film," a spokeswoman for Rudd said in a statement, the AP wrote. "The Australian government urges Iran to protect the rights of all Iranians and foreign citizens."

Iran's Orwellian justice system has provoked past controversies. Last year, for example, Iranian courts approved a death-by-stoning sentence for Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, a woman accused of adultery and murder charges. Ashtiani's sentence was stayed, but only after a global outcry from international human-rights groups.

A moratorium had been declared on stoning in 2002, but the nation's Islamic courts have continued to hand down stoning sentences in accordance with the strict wording of the law.

On Tuesday, Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad reportedly took to his website to criticize a flogging punishment handed down to a student who had criticized him.

"When high-profile figures freely insult the government, I disapprove that a youth is flogged for insulting me," Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wrote at his presidential website, the Associated Press reported.

Lashing sentences are not unheard of in the region. Last month, the Saudi king reportedly overturned a lashing sentence handed down to a Saudi woman who had been arrested for driving.

Megavirus chilensis : world's biggest virus

World’s biggest virus discovered in ocean depths near Chile | Technology News Blog - Yahoo! News
Billionaire adventurer Richard Branson may have large-scale plans for deep sea exploration, but a new ocean discovery makes big waves on a microscopic level. A team of researchers trawling the ocean floor have just published their findings of the world's new largest virus, found lurking off the coast of Las Cruces, Chile. It's so big, it's actual scientific name is Megavirus chilensis — and you can even view it with a basic light microscope. The previous virus record holder was Mimivirus, which boasted the largest diameter of any virus to date until Megavirus came along.

The virus' DNA features 1,259,197 base pairs, which encode some parasitic bacteria-like features. Unlike a virus, bacteria is a cellular organism — a virus can only infect and replicate itself within the cells of other organisms. It even has some built-in DNA repairing enzymes which allow the virus to repair damage from ultraviolet light, chemicals, and radiation.

Mimivirus was found in 1992, lurking in an amoeba in Bradford, England. Its capsid, the protein shell housing the virus' genetic material, was 400 nanometres wide. If that still sounds pretty tiny, most viruses fall in the range between 20 and 300 nanometres, making both Mimivirus and the new Megavirus titans of the microscopic world. Mimivirus and Megavirus are believed to have diverged from a shared viral ancestor somewhere along the evolutionary road, both developing into giant viruses in their own right.

Monday, October 10, 2011

Learn to be flexible

From : Daily Devotion from ACCTV

When conflicts arise, step back and look at what's really important. Give others the benefit of the doubt. When working with yourself, use your head; when working with others, use your heart. Learn to be flexible. Thomas Jefferson said, 'In matters of principle stand like a rock; in matters of taste swim with the current.' Don't major in minors, and stop fighting over things that ultimately make no difference. Be gracious with others in the same way God is gracious with you. Mature love allows someone who has failed to ease out of the situation with their dignity intact. Once you've made your point, back off!
In life, you're always going to have disagreements. They'll either give you ulcers or give you understandingóthe choice is yours. Don't over-react. When conflict arises make it a time to learn, not lose. If you're serious about building good relationships, live by the words, 'Love your neighbour as you love yourself.'

Friday, October 07, 2011

Snaptu: Pakistan 'vaccination' doctor accused of treason

Doctor accused of helping CIA find Osama bin Laden should be charged with high treason, says Pakistani state commission

A Pakistani doctor accused of helping the CIA to track down Osama bin Laden should be charged with high treason, a Pakistani…


Click here to read the full story

--
This email was sent to you from Snaptu mobile application.

Snaptu: Arab-Israeli towns go on strike over plans to confiscate their land

If Israel's parliament approves the proposal, 30,000 Bedouins could be removed from their homes in Negev within 60 days

Six Arab-Israeli towns in Israel's southern Negev region have ground to a halt in protest at government plans to confiscate…


Click here to read the full story

--
This email was sent to you from Snaptu mobile application.

Snaptu: Huaxi: the village that towers above China

Until recently, Huaxi was a poor farming community, typical of eastern China. Now, thanks to the ambition of one man, it is a powerhouse symbol of the country's economic expansion, embodied by a giant 328m-tall tower

An incongruous new sight has…


Click here to read the full story

--
This email was sent to you from Snaptu mobile application.

Thursday, October 06, 2011

Snaptu: Steve Jobs, Apple co-founder, dies at 56

The mastermind behind an empire that has revolutionised personal computing, telephony and music, dies in California

Steve Jobs, billionaire co-founder of Apple and the mastermind behind an empire of products that revolutionised computing, telephony…


Click here to read the full story

--
This email was sent to you from Snaptu mobile application.

Wednesday, October 05, 2011

Dark

You were not there for The Beginning. You will not be there for The End….
Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative….
In these days nobody can tell for sure which is which...

Sepuluh Tahun Perang Afghanistan

Quo Vadis
TEPAT sepuluh tahun lalu, yakni pada 7 oktober 2001,Presiden AS George Bush mengumumkan perang terhadap Osama bin Laden dan semua jaringannya. Osama dan jaringannya itu dianggap sebagai pelaku di balik peristiwa mega teror 9/11 yang menewaskan lebih dari 3.000 orang. Bush juga menyatakan perang terhadap Taliban yang dianggapnya sebagai kelompok yang akan melindungi Al-Qaidah. Setelah sebulan perang berlangsung, pada November Kabul pun jatuh ke tangan pasukan AS dan sekutunya yang dinamakan Aliansi Utara itu. Pada Desember 2001, pemerintahan sementara Afghanistan pun dibentuk dengan memilih pemimpin suku asal Pasthun,Hamid Karzai sebagai Presiden Afghanistan bentukan Amerika. Tidak heran, Karzai sering disebut sebagai pemimpin boneka karena memerintah sesuai dengan pesanan AS. Pada bulan yang sama, buruan AS, pemimpin Taliban Mullah Omar juga berhasil ditangkap.

Namun demikian, keberhasilan menangkap pemimpin Taliban itu, tidak berujung pada berakhirnya konflik di sana. Juga, bukan berarti Taliban berhasil dikuasai pasukan Aliansi Utara (pasukan NATO dan sekutunya). Justru dari sinilah malapetaka AS berawal. Bukan hanya AS, melainkan juga rakyat Afghanistan yang sampai kini tidak habis pikir mengapa AS memilih berperang di negeri mereka. Berdasarkan survei seperti dilaporkan CNN baru-baru ini, mayoritas warga Afganistan tidak mengetahui apa itu "Serangan 11 September" yang dalam hal ini merupakan motif utama AS menginjakkan kaki mereka di Afganistan.
Bagi rakyat Afganistan yang didomiansi oleh populasi muda itu,  kehadiran AS dan sekutunya hanya membawa penderitaan. Ini merupakan respon yang alami dari rakyat Afghanistan yang begitu terluka kaibat perang tidak berguna tersebut.

Bayangkan saja, ratusan ribu warga Afganistan tewas selama 10 tahun perang berlangsung di sana. Jumlah tentara AS yang meninggal pun terhitung sangat banyak mencapai lebih dari 2.700 orang. Parahnya, jumlah tentara AS  yang mati terbanyak terjadi pada 2010, mencapai lebih dari 700 orang. Untuk hitungan bulan, tercatat Juni 2010 sebagai bulan paling mematikan karena lebih dari 100 tentara AS tewas. Jatuhnya korban dari pihak AS ini masih berlanjut sampai kini, bahkan untuk tahun 2011 ini, terhitung AS mengalami kehilangaan tentaranya dalam jumlah terbanyak pada Agustus 2011, mencapai 70 orang. Ini menunjukkan, perang yang diserukan Bush sepuluh tahun lalu yang kemudian diteruskan penggantinya, Barack Obama, tidak menghasilkan perdamaian dan keamanan yang diharapkan AS. Justru musuh AS semakin banyak yang akhirnya menyulitkan negara ini untuk mendikte sejumlah kebijakannya di Timur Tengah dan wilayah lainnya di Asia akibat sentimen yang begitu tinggi di kalangan warga internasional.

Bagaimanapun yang namanya perang tidak akan pernah membawa ketentraman. Oleh karena itu, sejak awal pernyataan perang keluar dari mulut Bush, banyak orang sudah dapat memprediksi bahwa penderitaanlah yang akan terjadi. Ini terbukti,sepuluh tahun perang, puluhan ribu orang terbunuh dan ratusan miliar dolar AS terbuang untuk membiayai hal yang tidak berguna itu. Bahkan, penggunaan dana selama perang Afganistan, sebagiamana diungkap CNN (3/10) menunjukkan, tidak ada pengaturan dan proses audit yang jelas sehingga rawan penyimpangan. Soal ini memang sudah banyak diungkap bahwa tingkat korupsi di Afghanistan sangat tinggi. Dana yang didapat dari para pembayar pajak di  AS yang  digunakan untuk membiayai perang tersebut telah disalahgunakan. Uang tersebut dipakai untuk menyuap para kepala suku dan elit lainnya di Taliban agar mereka setia kepada AS. Selain itu, dana tersebut juga dipakai serampangan untuk membayar sejumlah organisasi non pemerintah yang membuka jasa layanan publik di sana, baik bagi tentara AS maupun elit Afganistan, diantaranya proyek jasa keamanan yang umunnya dikuasai klan keluarga Karzai (etnik Pasthun). Inilah yang menyebabkan perang di AFganistan bukan semata kebencian terhadap AS, tetapi juga kecemburuan sosial di antara warag setempat.  Akibat penggunaan dana yang tidak transparan ini, rakyat AS marah, baik itu kepada Bush maupun Obama. Akan tetapi, kedua pemimpin ini tidak hirau dengan protes warga yang menginginkan perang dihentikan dan semua tentara AS segera ditarik. Meskipun pada akhirnya, tekanan warga AS itu akhirnya membuat Obama menyetujui untuk memulangkan militer AS secara bertahap pada 2014 mendatang. Namun, ini sudah terlambat karena kerugian yang diderita baik oleh warga Afghanistan maupun rakyat AS sudah tidak ternilai. Krisis ekonomi di AS yang terjadi sejak 2008 lalu hingga kini belum berakhir. Bahkan jumlah hutang negara tersebut mencapai puncaknya pada Agustus lalu, yaitu sekitar 14,5 triliun dolar AS. Berdasarkan analisis sejumlah pengamat ekonomi AS, hutang AS yang besar ini dipicu oleh pengeluaran militer yang sangat besar. Bayangkan saja, untuk perang 10 tahun di Afganistan, AS telah membuang uang rakyatnya sendiri sebanyak 443 miliar dolar AS (lihat grafis) . Ini baru penghitungan di Afganistan, belum termasuk kalkulasi biaya perang lainnya di Irak dan negara Timur Tengah lainnya. Tidak heran, pundi-pundi keuangan AS semkain menipis, bahkan menjerat negara itu dalam hutang yang sangat besar yang akhirnya memperlambat pertumbuhan ekonomi negara berpenduduk sekitar 270 juta jiwa itu.

Kendati kini Obama sudah mengeluarkan kebijakan akan menarik semua pasukannya secara bertahap sampai 2012 mendatang, ini bukan solusi yang terbaik. Mengapa? Karena Amerika meninggalkan Afganistan dalam keaddaann yang jauh lebih buruk sebelum perang dimulai 10 tahun lalu. Tidak heran, banyak pihak menganggap tindakan Amerika itu sangat tidak bertanggung jawab. Jadi, saat ini posisi AS sangat dilematis, maju kena, mundur pun kena. Ini memang menjadi simalakma bagi AS yang lebih mementingkan perang daripada perdamaian. AS harus menanggung konsekuensinya.

Harapan AS agar warga Afghanistan menjadi sekutu mereka tidak tercapai. Justru kebencian rakyat Afghanistan terhadap AS semakin meningkat. Pasalnya, perang yang diserukan AS 10 tahun lalu telah berpengaruh dahsyat terhadap cara pandang generasi muda Afganistan yang saat perang diserukan kali pertamnya oleh Bush itu, mereka masih anak-anak dan remaja.
Kini setelah 10 tahun berlalu, mereka tumbuh menjadi individu yang sangat membeci AS karena apa yang mereka saksikan dalam 10 tahun terakhir ini telah mengganggu kejiwaan para anak muda Afganistan itu. Tidak heran, mayoritas kaum muda Afhanistan menganggap keberadaan AS dan sekutunya adalah penjajah yang telah menyengsarakan mereka. Sikap mereka yang bermusuhan ini telah menyulitkan AS untuk menggolkan tujuannya menjadikan rakyat Afghanistan sebagai pendukungnya. Banyak dari anak muda ini bergabung menjadi mujahidin yang rela berjuang sampai titik darah penghabisan untuk mengusir AS dan sekutunya yang dianggap sebagai penjajah itu. Contohnya saja, laporan investigasi Newsweek (5/10)  menyajikan wawancara terhadap sejumlah kaum mujahidin muda Afganistan. Para pejuang muda ini mengatakan, mereka tidak akan pernah berhenti untuk menghancurkan kekuatan AS dan sekutunya. Bahkan, saat ditanya apakah Taliban sebaiknya menyerah kepada AS, para mujahidin ini dengan lantang mengatakan, Taliban jangan sampai membuat kesepakatan damai apapun sampai Amerika dikalahkan. Mujahidin Rahman (28), salah seorang yang diwawancarai Nesweek itu, mengatakan, meskipun ia sudah lelah bertempur selama tujuh tahun terakhir ini, bahkan sampai rela meningalkan istri dan anaknya, dia tidak akan pernah mundur sampai AS dikalahkan. Pria sal Provinsi Paktika ini menambahkan, bagi para mujahidin, waktu bukan masalah. Berapa lama pun waktu yangharus dihabiskan untuk bertempur, mereka akan jalani itu agar AS dapat dikalahkan. "Waktu bagi kami tidak ada artinya. Jam kalian suatu saat tidak akan berdetik lagi karena aus dimakan waktu. Namun, bagi kami, waktu tidak akan pernah habis. Berapa lama pun perjuangan yang harus kami lakoni, tidak jadi masalah. Kami pantang menyerah. Di akhir nanti, kami akan menang," kata Rahman kepada jurnalis Nesweek belum lama ini.
Hal yang sama juga diungkapkan pejuang lainnya, Jabar (26).  "Tidak ada batas waktu untuk memenangi perang ini," ujar pria yang kehilangan tiga jarinya saat bertempur dengan pasukan Aliansi Utara pimpinan AS itu.
Komandan pasukan mujahidin Afgnaistan Dadullah pun mengungkapkan hal senada bahwa tidak akan ada kata menyerah bagi pasukannya. Selain itu, kata Dadullah, pihaknya tidak pernah kehabisan pejuang. Setiap saat rekrutmen penjuang baru terus dilakukan. "AS tidak akan pernah memahami bertapa kami ini cukup kuat dan  mampu  bertahan lama  mengahdapi roket-roket AS dan senjata lainnya, ujar Dadullah yang kehilangan kaki kirinya saat berjuang melawan tentara Uni Soviet pada 1980-an. Pernyataan serupa pun diungkapkan seorang anggota Taliban yang dalam laporan Neswekk namanya tidak disebutkan. Anggota Taliban senior ini mengatakan, saat AS datang ke Afgnaistan 10 tahun llau, dirinya langsung tahu bahwa AS pada akhirnya akan memutuskan keluar dari Afganistan. Pasalnya, kata dia, tentara AS memiliki banyak kenyamanan hidup di Amerika, rumah dan keluarga yang menunggu mereka. Namun, bagi para pejuang Afganistan, kenyamaan itu tidak pernah mereka rasakan. Sehari-hari mereka sudah biasa bergelut dengan pertempuran. "Para pejuang muda kami tidak pernah memikirkan waktu dan konsekuensi atas perjuangan yang mereka lakukan. Mereka tidak memiliki banyak hal untuk dirindukan. Banyak Pejuang Taliban tidak punya rumah sehingga mereka tidak terlalu peduli dengan apa yang dinamakan kenyamanan itu. Pokoknya, mereka akan terus berjuang untuk suatu niat yang suci, mengusir penjajah dari negeri ini," ujarnya.

Ini membuktikan, apa yang didapat AS dan sekutunya dalam sepuluh tahun Perang Afganistan adalah kemalangan yang telah menjerumuskan negara itu pada kerusakan yang beruntun, baik itu di bidang ekonomi maupun politik. Apa yang ditabur, itu pula yang dituai. Kini AS harus menuai semua konsekuensi akibat perang yang dibuatnya sendiri satu dekade lalu. (Huminca/"PR"/dari berbagai sumber)****


The Afghan war 10 years later: A look at the numbers

 – Afghanistan Crossroads - CNN.com Blogs
Here are some of the statistics from the Afghan war:

– More than 2,700 troops from the United States and its coalition partners have died during the 10 years of war in Afghanistan, according to a CNN count.

– Troops from at least 26 countries have died in action in Afghanistan, according to a CNN count.

– Of that total, at least 1,780 are U.S. servicemen and women, according to a CNN count.

– Britain has the second-highest number of fatalities with 382 killed. Canada is third with at least 157 killed.

– At least 41 servicewomen have died in Afghanistan, according to a CNN count. Of that total, 31 are U.S. servicewomen.

– More than 14,000 U.S. troops have been wounded in action, according to the Pentagon.

– Since the conflict began, the number of casualties has risen by the year, with a significant jump from 2008 to 2009. At least 296 coalition troops died in 2008. It nearly doubled in 2009 when 517 coalition troops were killed.

– The year with the highest number of fatalities thus far has been 2010, when 711 troops died.

– The worst month for fatalities was June 2010, when 103 troops died in action, according to a CNN count.

– Many of the troops killed in Afghanistan are between the ages of 19 and 29, according to a CNN analysis of the data. More 21-year-olds – 244 thus far - have died than any other age.

– Roadside bombs have killed at least 1,143 troops in Afghanistan, according to a CNN count. It is the leading cause of fatalities. Small-arms fire has killed at least 365 troops and at least 232 troops have been killed in helicopter crashes.

– The southern provinces of Helmand and Kandahar, home to some of the fiercest opposition to the presence of U.S. and coalition forces and the birthplace of the Taliban, have the highest casualty rates per province. Most of the deaths have occurred in those southern provinces and the mountainous eastern provinces that border Pakistan.

Nihilistic


Harry glanced at the drivers of the cars. They seemed unhappy. The world was unhappy. People were in the dark. People were terrified and disappointed. People were caught in traps. People were defensive and frantic. They felt as if their lives were being wasted. And they were right. (Bukowski)