Instagram

Translate

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Superdiets? Doctors said they're just a fairytale

The Observer
Some swear by chewing 32 times to aid digestion; others stick to raw vegetables and fruit; many opt for high-protein diets in the form of fish, chicken and beef; a few proclaim the powers of grapefruit juice.

Whichever diet you follow, there is a good chance that it will be challenged tomorrow, when one of the country's leading doctors exposes the "myths and fairytales" surrounding some of the world's best-known food fads.

Professor Chris Hawkey, president of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), will list more than a dozen famous diets when he addresses Gastro 2009, a major conference for doctors. They include "rawism", the grapefruit diet and the alkaline diet.

The chewing movement emerged in the 19th century with the claim that chewing each mouthful 32 times helped digestion. "Gladstone was apparently very eccentrically in favour of this diet," said Hawkey of the British prime minister who died in 1898. "The idea is that salivary enzymes start digestion." However, like many other diets, it was based more on "theory than evidence", according to Hawkey.

As for the Hollywood grapefruit diet, which is based on the belief that the fruit contains an enzyme that breaks down fat and which Kylie Minogue is reported to have used, Hawkey argued that the chemical is unlikely to even make it through the gut and into the body where it is meant to do its work.

"Food has been shrouded in myths and fairytales since time immemorial," he said, arguing that some people become "quasi-religious" about what they eat. "But what's important is to recognise that, despite the popularity of fad diets, we are losing a grip on the fight with obesity."

His comments come as a survey by the BSG shows that one in five Londoners would turn to weight-loss pills to slim down. As for the Atkins Nutritional Approach, the famous diet that is low in carbohydrates and high in protein, one in five women would try it, but only 2% believe it is healthy. For Hawkey, the diet is one of the few that carries at least a small amount of evidence.

"It is not terribly healthy in the sense that you are going to have a lot of fat, but if you lose weight then it is a good thing," he said. "The theory is that it resets the metabolic rate and there is some science to back that up."

He argues that there is no harm in any diet that retains some nutritional balance and makes an individual lose weight.

Among the more balanced diets he will mention is one promoted by the nutritionist Esther Blum, who advocates eating full-fat foods in moderation to help metabolise cholesterol and to improve sex drive. Its famous fans include Sarah Jessica Parker and Teri Hatcher.

"I'm all for informed scientists and practitioners actually debunking some of the mythology around diets," said Andrew Hill, professor of medical psychology at Leeds University. "People are looking for quick-fix repairs, but in fact they are very rare, particularly in relation to being overweight," Hill said.

"The idea that some new discovery or new way of combining food will give you an instant fix to your weight or health problem is nearly always misinformed. Health isn't immediately reparable; weight isn't immediately modifiable."


Idle

Sorry, I haven't posted much recently because of some personal issues. Everyone has problem, and so do I. I hope I can cope it well. Have a nice Sunday for everyone! 

Thursday, November 19, 2009

trafficking

Canberra Woman Charged With Human Trafficking, Debt Bondage And Prostitution | Gov Monitor
A 42-year-old woman will face ACT Magistrates Court this morning, after being charged by the Australian Federal Police (AFP).

The woman has been charged with offences including possessing a slave, debt bondage and operating an illegal brothel.

It will be alleged in court that the woman brought sex workers to Australia to work in exploitative conditions in Canberra.

Officers from the AFP’s Transnational Sexual Exploitation and Trafficking Teams (TSETT) executed a search warrant on 14 October 2009 in the Canberra suburb of Kambah.

The woman was arrested and charged with the following offences:

* Possessing a slave, contrary to section 270.3(1)(a) of the Criminal Code 1995 (Cth)

* Debt Bondage, contrary to section 271.8(1) of the Criminal Code 1995 (Cth)

* Attempting to pervert the course of justice, contrary to section 43 of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)

* Two counts of allowing a non-citizen to work in breach of a visa condition, contrary to section 245AC of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)

* Allowing an unlawful non-citizen to work, contrary to section 245AB of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)

* Operating a brothel other than in a prescribed location, contrary to section 18 of the Prostitution Act (ACT)

The woman was granted conditional bail to appear at the ACT Magistrates Court today (18 November 2009).

A 55-year-old Preston man has also been served with a summons in connection with this matter and is due to appear in ACT Magistrates Court today.

The TSETT were established to investigate Commonwealth offences relating to trafficking in persons for sexual or labour exploitation.

Where a potential victim is identified, the AFP responds immediately to remove identified trafficking victims from harm, and to initiate victim support arrangements in line with the whole-of-government strategy to combat trafficking.

Australia is recognised as a destination country for such activities, though current data suggests the number of victims in Australia is low with 141 victims provided with support on the program since 2004.

By its very nature, this crime type involves people who are reluctant to come forward due to shame, threats or fear.

Police urge anyone with information they believe may be related to people trafficking or sexual servitude to contact the AFP on 1800 813 784 (free call).

The maximum penalty for these offences is 25 years imprisonment.

Topics: AFP, Australia, Australian Federal Police, Canberra, debt bondage, Governance, human trafficking, illegal brothel, Kambah, labour exploitation, prostitution, sex crimes, sex workers, sexual exploitation, slave, Transnational Sexual Exploitation and Trafficking Teams, TSETT


Helping Islam's green shoots grow

| Nazry Bahrawi | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk
In battling climate change, Indonesian Muslims have led their counterparts elsewhere in promoting the idea that Islam must not be a fair-weathered faith when it comes to environmental degradation.

They did so without the prodding of a grand conservation blueprint such as that unveiled at this month's UN-funded Alliance of Religions and Conservation meeting at Windsor Castle. Among the plan's many targets is the transformation of the 10 most sacred Islamic cities into eco-friendly sites in the next five years.

Rather, Indonesian activists have acted independently to push for the greening of Islam in a movement that could be traced back some two decades when discourses about environmental conservation first appeared in the rhetoric of the Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), Indonesia's two largest Islamic grassroots organisations.

In recent years, both have set up branches focused on implementing environmental programmes. For instance, the NU is working closely with the ministry of forestry to battle the depletion of trees brought about primarily by illegal logging in Indonesia's national forests.

Two years back, a group of NU clerics even went as far as issuing a fatwa against the government's plan to build a nuclear power plant in central Java. They reason that nuclear fallout is plausible as Indonesia is situated along the seismically active Pacific "Ring of Fire" fault line.

Even Islamic boarding schools or pesantren – once considered a hotbed of extremism – have turned over a green leaf. For instance, the Ilmu Giri school conducts programmes for farmers to replenish trees in their vicinity. Its founder, Nasruddin Anshory, preaches that the felling of one tree must be replaced by the seeding of two.

Meanwhile, the nation's environment ministry has launched an eco-pesantren programme in about 90 schools in the Yogyakarta province to impart practical knowledge on preserving and developing the environment.

In a world suffering from an environmental deficit, Indonesia's godly green shoots are a positive sign. Yet they could also wither. If mismanaged, the positive hype generated by the surging Islamic eco-activism could quickly degrade into an eco-jihad.

This warning was issued by leading Indonesian environmental activist Fachruddin Mangunjaya. While he downplays the possibility that green causes could be hijacked by extremist groups, he cautions that a confrontation could break out between the state and lay Muslims if Indonesia's national council of religious leaders continues to protest against the government's plan to build a nuclear power plant by 2016.

Furthermore, implementation of conservation programmes has been wanting in some areas. In the past several years, the practice by Indonesian farmers of clearing farmland by burning vegetation has been widespread, bringing about the south-east Asian haze.

Such glitches suggest that Indonesia is not yet a model of religious conservationism. To this end, one of the nation's foremost tasks should surely be to translate its eco-activism into a comprehensive eco-theology.

Here, Indonesia should propound an Islamic philosophy of environmentalism that is not just flora-centric but fauna-friendly too. Yet Indonesian Muslims have only demonstrated a proclivity for the former.

Embracing such an ideal is tricky considering that meat consumption is a natural part of the Islamic way of life. While it is unrealistic to expect Muslims to stop eating meat, the burgeoning halal industry in Indonesia – and other parts of the Muslim world too – runs the risk of degenerating into a capitalistic venture that sees animals existing merely to satiate man's needs.

Averting such an unscrupulous commodification of Islam necessitates a re-interpretation of the term khalifah in the oft-quoted Surah 2:30 of the Qur'an that describes man's role on Earth. Scholars have popularly interpreted khalifah as "vicegerent", implying that man is a supreme ruler over other beings. Such an interpretation justifies the indiscriminate exploitation of animals.

If Indonesians are serious about religious environmentalism, they would be the first to heed Birmingham-based Islamic environmental activist Fazlun Khalid's proposal to reinterpret khalifah as "vice-regent". This latter term denotes that man's mandate on Earth is to not to rule but merely act in the name of another higher authority – namely, God. Muslims are thus required to treat other living beings with trepidation and humility. Such a paradigm shift would naturally give rise to efforts to treat cattle humanely.