She may be a grandmother, but don't call her old.
Ernestine Shepherd, 74, of Baltimore has been crowned by the Guinness Book of World Records as the oldest competitive female bodybuilder ever.
She told the Washington Post: 'Age is nothing but a number'.
Ms Shepherd has impeccably toned 'six-pack' abs that are the marvel of her Baltimore fitness centre.
Translate
Monday, May 30, 2011
Ernestine Shepherd is Guinness oldest female bodybuilder at 74
Minority of American couples have tied the knot
Married couples are in the minority in America for the first time.
In last year’s U.S. census, married couples represented 48 per cent of all households, down from 52 per cent a decade earlier.
Experts attributed the change to a fast-growing older population who are more likely to be divorced or widowed, and young people delaying marriage amid fears of not being able to hang on to a job and a shift away from having children at a young age.
Meanwhile the number of opposite-sex couples living together rather than marrying jumped 13 per cent from 2009 to 7.5million.
Dutch to ban foreigners from cannabis coffee shops |
Holland is to bar foreigners from its infamous cannabis-selling coffee shops.
Anti-drugs laws will see restrictions placed on who can use the shops, which allow patrons to buy and smoke drugs legally.
The rules, called ‘tourism suicide’ by some, could put an end to many of the tens of thousands visits made by Britons to Amsterdam every year.
Sunday, May 29, 2011
Snaptu: How to choose sustainable fish - interactive
Snaptu: Meat is murder? More like suicide, argues Planeat film | Damian Carrington
Eating animals and their products is bad for our health and our planet, according to a subtle new polemic
Can a polemic be subtle? If so, the new documentary Planeat, is almost that rare beast.
The polemic is against eating meat. Cleverly…
Click here to read the full story
--This email was sent to you from Snaptu mobile application.
Friday, May 27, 2011
Thursday, May 26, 2011
Obama's policy toward middle east
| Obama tempered some of his idealism by admitting that America had a strategic self-interest in the Middle East. "We must squarely acknowledge that we have enduring interests in the region: to fight terror with partners who may not always be perfect, and to protect against disruptions in the world's energy supply." source : http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/may/25/obama-west-freedom-middle-east |
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
You are more likely to die from a bee sting than in a plane crash
DITCH THE MAKE-UP 'Remove all traces of make-up before you board. It can dry the skin, clog pores and trigger breakouts,' says dermatologist Dr Sam Bunting. But if you can't live without it, opt for lighter alternatives. 'Swap foundation for a tinted moisturiser to allow skin to breathe and replace lipstick with a tinted balm to keep lips hydrated,' says celebrity facialist Sarah Chapman. MOVE AROUND Sitting in one place for a long time slows down blood flow and leads to a build-up of fluids in the feet and ankles, resulting in puffiness. In more serious cases, this can cause deep vein thrombosis (DVT), in which a blood clot forms. Flight socks (£13.27, boots.com) will compress the bottom of the legs to encourage blood circulation. 'Curl and uncurl your toes, and flex them back and point them forward every half an hour, change the position of your legs and stretch your back and arms,' says yoga expert Chris James. The inflatable Alida Travel Stepper (£5.15, victoriahealth.com) is said to boost blood flow. STAY HYDRATED 'Drinking plenty of water will stop dehydration, flush out your system, prevent bloating and help you get over jet lag faster,' says Cvijetic. Cabin crew are advised to drink a litre of water on short-haul flights and at least two on longer trips. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1389800/Sky-high-beauty-First-class-tips-look-immaculate-Cheryl-Cole-Victoria-Beckham-arrivals.html#ixzz1NMRicAPF |
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Manal al-Sharif was arrested because she drove a car
While all eyes are on Libya, Syria and Yemen, a different kind of rebellion is taking place in Saudi Arabia. A group of Saudi women have set up Women2Drive, a right-to-drive campaign, with a launch date of 17 June. Last week one of its members, Manal al-Sharif, took to the streets and drove a car for a couple of hours, filming her trip (her father assisted) and posting it on YouTube. On Sunday, she was arrested along with her brother, who reportedly has now been released. This isn't the first time that there has been a push to drive in the kingdom. In the early 1990s, members of a similar campaign were arrested and some were fired from their jobs. Against the backdrop of the Arab uprisings, it might seem like a frivolous thing to ask, especially when we are told that Saudi women do not need to drive, as they are so covetously protected and provided with drivers to save them the trouble. The irony is that although the entire system is constructed to prevent men and women finding khalwa, or privacy, together, it is permissible to be alone in a car with one's non-Saudi driver – the perfect confluence of racism and patronage that exposes the absurdity and confusion behind arbitrary laws of public female deportment in Saudi Arabia. There is nothing empowering or protective about not being allowed to drive. While I was living in Saudi Arabia, in a family of five females with no man in the household, we were permanently at the mercy of our driver to run even the most basic of errands. If he was late, indisposed or unable to tend to us for some reason, the only alternative was to hail a taxi – a very unpleasant prospect for a woman in a Saudi city. To stand on the side of the road in the city of Riyadh waiting for a taxi to arrive meant braving the harassing calls and jibes from passing motorists, and to be alone in a car with a cab driver in a country where that is rather rare posed its own risks in terms of the liberties the driver feels he may be entitled to take. Sharif herself claimed she was harassed by her driver. Needless to say, there is no public transport available for women. Those who espouse a moral position, ie that should these women be allowed to drive they would run amok and go wherever they please putting themselves in harm's way and making rendezvous with men, are either disingenuous or naive. Most of the employed drivers in Saudi Arabia have no say over where they go, they merely do their mistresses' bidding. I remember being given a ride with a Saudi female colleague who ordered her driver to chase, at high speeds, the cars of men whom she found attractive or who had tried to pass their numbers through car windows. The driver haplessly complied, and was told off in strong terms for not catching up with the quarry. This law is simply a backward, visceral objection to the thought of a woman behind the wheel, a physical embodiment of a volition which is too offensive to enact. It is about maintaining some semblance of control, the erosion of which it is thought would be complete if women were allowed to drive. There is this odd view of women in the kingdom as being always on the cusp of dissolute behaviour – reminiscent of an attitude towards slaves who would rebel and murder their owners if not kept perpetually oppressed. This is a ghastly spiral, where the worse the victim is treated, the worse they are likely to be pre-emptively repressed. When arguing against allowing women to uncover their heads or faces in public, some (men and women) respond that if that if this were to pass, women would surely walk around in semi-nudity. It doesn't occur to these people that public codes of dress do not exist in most other Arab countries, and women still manage to dress in a culturally appropriate way. Women are allowed to drive throughout the conservative Arabian Gulf, and these societies have not imploded in moral degradation. The Saudi driving ban is a social, rather than political, issue, over which the authorities would rather not incur the religious establishment's wrath or create controversy. But if there is one lesson Arab rulers would do well to heed, it is that withholding rights raises the chances of an explosion of dissent. The arrest of Sharif certainly appears to have done nothing to dissuade the Women2Drive campaign from going ahead; if anything it seems to have garnered it more publicity. There are reports that the religious police are teaming up with traffic forces to patrol and stymie the campaign. If these are to be believed, then Saudi Arabia is in for a first-of-its-kind confrontation on 17 June. |
Ryan Giggs suing Twitter
source : http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/may/23/twitter-traffic-injunction-footballer?intcmp=239 UK traffic to Twitter's website spiked by 22% on Saturday as people flocked to the social messaging site to find out about the footballer who had taken out an injunction against the site, according to research from the measurement company Experian Hitwise. The traffic was 10% higher than for the site's previous busiest day in the UK, which came on 9 May when the media reported on the creation of an account on the site which purported to name those who had taken out superinjunctions to prevent details being reported. Hitwise also noted a dramatic rise last week in search terms linked to the injunction served by Giggs' lawyers on the site. "Ryan Giggs suing Twitter" was the fourth most popular term for the entire week ending on Saturday, despite the fact that the story only broke on the Friday evening. "Who is CTB footballer" was the 10th most popular search term for the whole week. That was reflected too in Hitwise's data from social networks such as Facebook and Twitter, where "twitter footballer" and "ryan giggs suing twitter" ranked in the top two or three. Experian Hitwise takes its data from internet service providers in the UK, and its figures for visits to Twitter show a steady rise in traffic during March, with its share of internet visits in the UK growing by nearly 60%. That represents millions of people visiting the site for the first time, and could mark a tipping point in its popularity in the UK. |
injunction and superinjunction
A complete recasting of social media and internet regulation was signalled by the government as an MP used parliamentary privilege to name Ryan Giggs as the footballer identified on Twitter as having brought an injunction to prevent publication of allegations he had an affair with a former reality TV star. David Cameron, facing an increasingly aggressive tabloid campaign to stop the high court granting injunctions protecting the privacy of celebrities, announced a joint parliamentary committee to examine the complex related issues of privacy, injunctions, the regulation of the internet and the role of the press complaints commission. He said the current position was not sustainable. During Commons questions on the government's move, the Liberal Democrat MP John Hemming named the Manchester United player , wrongfooting the Speaker, John Bercow, and instantly opening the floodgates to reporting by the mainstream media. Hemming said he had a right to do so because the footballer had already been named by 75,000 people on Twitter, but many MPs and peers accused him of being a self publicist who had abused parliamentary privilege. Just as the footballer's name began to circulate widely across the media after Hemming's intervention, a high court judge ruled against the Sun newspaper and insisted that the injunction preventing him being named should still be upheld, in a decision that media organisations had not expected. Mr Justice Tugendhat, delivering his ruling on Monday night, acknowledged "it is obvious that if the purpose [of the injunction] was to protect a secret then it would have now failed", but argued that its purpose was to protect the footballer from "harassment". In March, the Ministry of Justice published proposals for a draft defamation bill intended to address all the key issues of defamation and privacy on the internet including the responsibility of internet service providers to police material published on their sites. Calling for "a time out" to re-examine the issue of privacy, Cameron said: "It's not fair on the newspapers if all the social media can report this and the newspapers can't and so the law and the practice has got to catch up with how people consume media today. I don't think there's an easy answer to this." The formal announcement of the joint committee was hastily made by Dominic Grieve, the attorney general. The joint committee, due to be report this autumn, was a deliberate effort by a nervous government to turn the future of press freedom and privacy into a cross-party issue, so reducing pressure on Cameron personally to reach potentially controversial conclusions. Its conclusions could nonetheless have far-reaching ramifications for tabloid newspapers too if the government attempts to reframe privacy laws. The government's efforts to contain the controversy fell apart when Hemming used Grieve's Commons statement on the joint committee to declare: "Mr Speaker, With about 75,000 people having named Ryan Giggs on Twitter it is impractical to imprison them all ..." His defiance led to gasps and a shout of "disgrace" before a startled Speaker quickly interrupted. "Let me just say to the honourable gentleman, I know he's already done it, but occasions such as this are occasions for raising the issues of principle involved, not seeking to flout for whatever purpose," Bercow said. Within minutes of Hemming naming Giggs, mainstream newspapers and broadcasters used the protection of privilege to identify the footballer. Hemming later said he was trying to stop lawyers for Giggs using the courts to oppress and imprison individuals in secret just for retelling gossip on Twitter. He said: "The first steps had been taken to identity people who had started the gossip. There are people who are jailed in secret in this country." Hemming had already tested judicial authority last week by revealing the banker Sir Fred Goodwin had been granted a superinjunction. Hemming's move was condemned by MPs and peers. John Whittingdale, the Conservative chairman of the culture select committee said: "If MPs think the law is wrong then we should change the law rather than flout the law." Lady Kennedy, the Labour peer, said: "The reason most of the tabloid press want to write about footballers lives is to make a profit. Newspapers are in a parlous state at the moment ... we need a more grown up debate than this." Last week, it emerged that the high court had granted its initial ruling on the basis of a belief that the footballer may well have been blackmailed by Imogen Thomas. She had been accused in evidence submitted by the player of asking him for £50,000 and then £100,000 for her silence – a claim she denies. However, Mr Justice Eady indicated that he was inclined to believed the player's account, concluding there was "ample reason not to trust Thomas". Mr Justice Tugendhat's ruling was the third time in on Monday the injunction had been upheld, with verdicts from two different judges, underlining the strength of judicial feeling on the controversy. Mr Justice Eady said in a written judgment: "Should the court buckle every time one of its orders meets widespread disobedience or defiance? In a democratic society, if a law is deemed to be unenforceable or unpopular, it is for the legislature to make such changes as it decides are appropriate". However, the Sun chose to come back to the high court after a Scottish newspaper, the Sunday Herald, printed a barely concealed photograph of the footballer on its front page and Cameron said in an interview on ITV's Daybreak programme that he was aware of the footballer's identity "like everybody else". Representing the Sun in the second hearing, Richard Spearman QC told the court that keeping the privacy injunction in place was futile. He said that "today this has moved on very dramatically" and that the footballer had conceded "an own goal" by allowing his legal team to threaten legal action against Twitter and its users. source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/may/23/ryan-giggs-mp-injunction |
